India’s Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has ordered Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy Private Limited and its founder, stock-market educator Avadhut Sathe, to refund ₹546.17 crore collected from participants for activities the regulator found amounted to unregistered investment-advisory and research-analyst services. The order, issued on October 23, 2026, also requires the academy and its founder to deposit ₹67.87 crore in interest with SEBI’s Investor Protection and Education Fund.
The regulator has imposed penalties totalling ₹11.5 crore on the academy, Avadhut Sathe and academy director Gouri Avadhut Sathe. It has also barred the academy and its founder from accessing the securities market for two years or until they comply with the refund direction, whichever is later. The case highlights SEBI’s efforts to distinguish legitimate stock-market education from activities that amount to regulated investment advice, particularly when financial influencers provide trading recommendations through paid courses, live sessions and messaging groups.
Key Takeaways
- Refund order: SEBI has directed the academy and its founder to refund ₹546.17 crore to eligible participants.
- Interest: An additional ₹67.87 crore must be deposited with SEBI’s Investor Protection and Education Fund.
- Penalties: The academy faces a ₹6 crore penalty, Avadhut Sathe ₹4 crore and Gouri Sathe ₹1.5 crore.
- Market restrictions: The academy and its founder face a two-year market-access ban or a longer period until they comply with the refund direction, whichever is later.
- Regulatory finding: SEBI found that activities presented as education included stock-specific recommendations and trading guidance requiring registration.
- Refund timeline: The academy and its founder must deposit the specified refund amount within five months of receiving the order and publish refund instructions within 30 days.
What Did SEBI Order Against Avadhut Sathe?
SEBI’s final order targets Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy, its founder Avadhut Sathe and director Gouri Avadhut Sathe. The regulator found that the academy’s paid programmes went beyond general financial education and included services that fell within the regulatory framework for investment advisers and research analysts.
The order requires the academy and its founder to jointly refund ₹546.17 crore, representing fees attributed to the programmes covered by SEBI’s findings. The regulator has separately directed them to deposit ₹67.87 crore in interest with its Investor Protection and Education Fund.
The penalties are separate from the refund and interest obligations.
| Measure | Amount or restriction |
|---|---|
| Refund to eligible participants | ₹546.17 crore |
| Interest payable to SEBI’s Investor Protection and Education Fund | ₹67.87 crore |
| Penalty on Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy | ₹6 crore |
| Penalty on Avadhut Sathe | ₹4 crore |
| Penalty on Gouri Avadhut Sathe | ₹1.5 crore |
| Total penalties | ₹11.5 crore |
| Payment deadline for penalties | Within 45 days of receiving the order |
The refund and interest directions together amount to approximately ₹614.04 crore, excluding the ₹11.5 crore in penalties. These are regulatory directions; the final amount ultimately distributed to individual claimants will depend on the refund process and eligibility.
Sources: Moneycontrol, The Economic Times.
Why Did SEBI Take Action?
The investigation examined whether the academy was providing investment advice and research services without the registrations required under SEBI regulations.
According to the regulator’s findings, the academy and its founder provided recommendations involving specific securities, entry and exit levels, stop-loss targets and trading strategies. These activities reportedly took place through paid programmes, live trading sessions and WhatsApp groups.
SEBI’s position was that calling such activities educational did not automatically exempt them from regulatory requirements. Recommendations can influence a participant’s investment decisions even when they are delivered during a training session.
The academy and its founder argued that their programmes were educational and that participants made their own trading decisions. SEBI rejected that argument in its final order, finding that the nature of the activities—not simply the label attached to the programmes—determined whether registration was required.
The decision illustrates an important principle for financial educators: explaining market concepts is different from providing recommendations that direct people toward particular securities or trading actions.
SEBI’s Findings on Promotional Claims and Trading Results
The investigation also examined how the academy promoted its programmes.
SEBI said promotional videos and testimonials highlighted profitable trades and claims about participants’ earnings while failing to present an adequate picture of overall trading performance. The regulator had issued an administrative warning in March 2024 concerning misleading representations and selective disclosure of trading results.
According to the final-order reporting, SEBI found that such promotional material continued after the warning. It also raised concerns about recommendations being delivered without assessing whether they were suitable for the people receiving them.
These findings matter because people considering expensive trading courses may rely heavily on testimonials, screenshots of profitable trades and claims about potential returns. Selective examples can create an impression of consistent success that does not reflect the broader outcomes of participants.
SEBI’s action reinforces the need for transparent performance claims and compliance with applicable regulations when a financial educator’s activities cross into advisory or research services.
How Much Money Was Collected, and Who Can Claim a Refund?
SEBI’s investigation recorded approximately ₹601.38 crore collected from course participants since the academy’s inception. Of that amount, the regulator identified ₹546.17 crore attributable to the programmes covered by its refund and disgorgement directions.
The two figures are not interchangeable. The total collected represents the broader amount reported in the investigation, while ₹546.17 crore is the amount SEBI specifically directed to be refunded.
The academy and its founder must publish notices within 30 days of receiving the order. The notices must explain how eligible participants can submit refund claims and are to appear in English- and Hindi-language national newspapers and a widely circulated local-language newspaper.
The refund amount must be deposited into a designated bank account within five months of receiving the order. After the claims process, any remaining money must be deposited with SEBI and held in an escrow account for one year to facilitate distribution to eligible clients, complainants and investors who received the relevant advisory or research services. Any amount still remaining after that period is to be transferred to the Investor Protection and Education Fund.
The order also directs debit restrictions on the academy’s and founder’s bank accounts until the required deposits are made, along with restrictions on selling assets except where necessary to comply with the refund directions.
Participants who believe they qualify should watch for the formal refund notices and retain course-payment receipts, invoices, bank statements, programme details and relevant communications. They should rely on the official claim procedure rather than assuming that every past course fee will automatically be returned.
What Happens to Avadhut Sathe and the Academy?
The academy and its founder have been prohibited from accessing or dealing in the securities market for two years or until they comply with the refund direction, whichever is later. The restriction covers direct and indirect market access under the order.
Gouri Avadhut Sathe, a director of the academy, has been barred from accessing the securities market for six months and has received a ₹1.5 crore penalty. SEBI treated her responsibility separately, attributing it to a failure to exercise adequate oversight rather than finding that she personally provided the disputed services or designed the arrangement.
The order also requires the parties to stop providing investment-advisory and research-analyst services without the necessary registration. The penalties must be paid within 45 days of receipt of the order.
The restrictions are intended to address both the conduct identified by the regulator and the financial obligations arising from it.
The Bigger Picture
The Avadhut Sathe case is part of a wider regulatory effort to address the growing influence of financial educators and social-media personalities in India’s retail investment market. Online courses, live trading demonstrations and messaging groups can reach large audiences, but they can also blur the line between general education and advice that falls under securities regulation.
For consumers, the case is a reminder to examine claims about trading success carefully and understand what a paid programme actually provides. For educators and financial influencers, it underscores that describing a service as a course or mentorship programme does not necessarily remove registration obligations if the service includes regulated recommendations.
SEBI’s order also makes the refund process a central issue for affected participants. The amount directed to be returned is substantial, but eligible claimants will need to follow the formal procedure and deadlines set out in the order.
FAQs
1. Why has SEBI ordered Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy to refund ₹546 crore?
SEBI found that the academy and its founder provided unregistered investment-advisory and research-analyst services through paid programmes and trading guidance. The regulator directed them to refund ₹546.17 crore attributable to the activities covered by its findings.
2. How much interest must be paid?
SEBI has directed the academy and its founder to deposit ₹67.87 crore in interest with the Investor Protection and Education Fund, in addition to the refund amount.
3. What is the total penalty imposed in the case?
The total penalty is ₹11.5 crore: ₹6 crore on the academy, ₹4 crore on Avadhut Sathe and ₹1.5 crore on Gouri Avadhut Sathe. This is separate from the refund and interest obligations.
4. Will everyone who purchased an academy course automatically receive a refund?
Not necessarily. The order identifies an amount to be refunded to eligible participants. The academy and its founder must publish notices explaining how claims can be made, and participants should follow that formal process and retain supporting payment records.
5. Can Avadhut Sathe continue trading in the stock market?
Under the final order, the academy and Avadhut Sathe are barred from accessing the securities market for two years or until they comply with the refund direction, whichever is later. Gouri Avadhut Sathe faces a separate six-month market-access restriction.
Looking Ahead
The next important steps are the publication of refund notices, the deposit of the directed amount and the establishment of a process for verifying and paying eligible claims. Participants should monitor official notices and retain documentation so they can respond when the claims procedure is announced. The order’s five-month refund deadline runs from receipt of the order, not simply from the date it was reported in the news.
More broadly, the case is likely to remain relevant to India’s financial education industry as SEBI scrutinizes how trading strategies, stock-specific recommendations and performance claims are presented to paying customers. The distinction between teaching market concepts and providing regulated investment services will remain central to compliance for academies, financial influencers and online trading communities.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
