Australia has passed a landmark law requiring major technology platforms to financially support local news publishers or face a levy on their Australian digital advertising revenue. The News Bargaining Incentive is designed to force large platforms to negotiate commercial agreements with Australian media organisations, with companies that fail to meet the requirements facing a levy of 2.5% of their Australian advertising revenue.
The legislation represents Australia’s latest attempt to address the imbalance between technology platforms and traditional media companies, which argue that Google, Meta and other digital platforms benefit from news content while capturing a large share of online advertising revenue. The final law requires covered platforms to establish commercial agreements with at least eight Australian publishers, while the government has also introduced mechanisms intended to direct money toward smaller and public-interest news organisations.
Australia Introduces New Big Tech News Levy
The new framework replaces Australia’s earlier approach under the News Media Bargaining Code with a stronger financial incentive for technology companies to negotiate directly with news publishers.
Under the legislation, major digital platforms that meet the eligibility criteria must make commercial arrangements supporting the creation and availability of Australian news. If they do not meet the required threshold, they can face a levy based on their Australian digital advertising revenue.
The measure is intended to prevent technology companies from simply avoiding negotiations while continuing to benefit from news-related engagement on their platforms.
Key Numbers Under the New Law
| Measure | Latest Provision |
|---|---|
| Levy rate | 2.5% of Australian digital advertising revenue |
| Minimum commercial deals | 8 publishers |
| Single-deal offset cap | 25% of levy liability |
| Eligibility revenue threshold | A$250 million annual ad revenue |
| Large-publisher tax offset | 150% |
| Smaller-media tax offset | 200% |
| Main objective | Fund Australian journalism |
The precise economic impact will depend on how much covered platforms spend through qualifying commercial agreements.
Which Big Tech Companies Are Affected?
The legislation targets major technology companies operating significant search or social-media services in Australia.
Companies identified as being within the framework include Google, Meta, TikTok and Microsoft’s LinkedIn, provided they meet the applicable thresholds.
The government has designed the rules around companies with significant market power rather than imposing the same requirements on every digital platform.
Platforms Facing the New Rules
| Company | Major Relevant Service | Potential Exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Search | News and search traffic | |
| Meta | Facebook and related platforms | Social-media news distribution |
| TikTok | Short-form video/social platform | News discovery and engagement |
| Microsoft | Professional/social news distribution |
The inclusion of LinkedIn is notable because the platform’s business model differs considerably from those of Google, Facebook and TikTok.
How the 2.5% Levy Works
The levy is designed primarily as an incentive rather than simply a conventional tax.
A covered technology company can reduce or avoid the financial burden by entering qualifying agreements with Australian publishers. The legislation therefore gives platforms a choice: spend money supporting news organisations through commercial arrangements or pay the levy.
The government has also placed a limit on how much of the liability can be offset through any individual deal.
Commercial Deal vs Levy Model
| Platform Action | Result |
|---|---|
| Meets required publisher-deal threshold | Can avoid levy |
| Fails to meet threshold | Levy can apply |
| Signs multiple qualifying deals | Reduces potential levy exposure |
| One very large publisher deal | Cannot account for more than 25% of liability |
| Supports smaller media organisations | Higher tax-offset incentive |
This structure is intended to prevent a technology company from signing one large agreement with a dominant publisher and using that single deal to satisfy the entire policy objective.
Why Australia Is Targeting Big Tech
The legislation is based on the argument that Australia’s news industry has lost advertising revenue and bargaining power as consumers have shifted from newspapers and broadcaster websites toward digital platforms.
Google and Meta, in particular, have become major gateways through which consumers discover information online.
News publishers argue that while platforms can benefit from news-related engagement, publishers bear the cost of employing journalists, maintaining newsrooms and producing original reporting.
The Australian government says the new framework is intended to help maintain a viable local journalism industry, including regional and smaller news organisations.
The Law Builds on Australia’s Earlier News Code
Australia was already a global pioneer in attempting to make technology platforms compensate news organisations.
The country’s News Media Bargaining Code was introduced in 2021 after regulators concluded that major digital platforms had significant bargaining advantages over news publishers.
The earlier system allowed platforms and eligible news businesses to negotiate commercial agreements, with the government retaining the ability to designate platforms for mandatory bargaining if negotiations failed.
The new News Bargaining Incentive takes a different approach by creating a clearer financial consequence for platforms that do not make sufficient commercial commitments.
Australia’s Regulatory Evolution
| Stage | Policy Approach |
|---|---|
| 2021 | News Media Bargaining Code introduced |
| Later years | Platforms negotiate commercial agreements |
| 2026 proposal | New News Bargaining Incentive designed |
| August 2026 | Parliament passes final legislation |
| New framework | Commercial deals or financial levy |
The change reflects the government’s view that voluntary agreements alone may not provide sufficient long-term support for Australian journalism.
Eight Publisher Deals Are Now Required
One of the most important changes in the final legislation is the number of commercial agreements required.
Platforms must establish deals with at least eight different Australian publishers to meet the framework’s requirement. The threshold was increased from an earlier proposal involving six publishers.
The government argues that requiring multiple deals should spread funding more widely across the media sector.
This is particularly relevant for smaller publishers that may have considerably less negotiating power than major national media companies.
Why the Eight-Deal Requirement Matters
The policy is intended to prevent the money from being concentrated among only Australia’s largest media companies.
Smaller publishers can play an important role in regional reporting, specialist journalism and coverage of communities that may receive less attention from national media organisations.
The government has therefore incorporated stronger incentives for platforms to support smaller media businesses.
Higher Tax Offsets for Smaller Publishers
The law provides different tax-offset mechanisms depending on the type of publisher receiving support.
Deals with larger publishers can receive a 150% tax offset, while qualifying spending directed toward smaller media organisations can receive a 200% offset.
The structure effectively makes certain forms of media spending more valuable to technology companies than others.
| Publisher Category | Tax Offset |
|---|---|
| Larger publishers | 150% |
| Smaller media organisations | 200% |
| Maximum contribution from one deal | 25% of levy liability |
The government hopes this will encourage technology companies to spread their spending across Australia’s broader journalism ecosystem.
Public-Interest Journalism Gets Additional Support
The legislation also includes provisions aimed at public-interest journalism.
Five percent of money collected through the framework is expected to support the Australian Associated Press, according to reporting on the final legislation.
This is intended to strengthen a part of Australia’s media infrastructure that provides news to newspapers, broadcasters and other publishers.
The broader objective is to ensure that the policy does not simply transfer money between a small number of large corporations but contributes to the availability of journalism across the country.
Potential Impact on Google and Meta
Google and Meta are likely to face the greatest attention because of their enormous role in Australia’s digital advertising and information ecosystem.
Both companies have previously resisted policies that require them to pay publishers for news content.
The new system changes the negotiating dynamic because refusing to enter sufficient commercial agreements can now create a measurable financial cost.
Potential Effects on Big Tech
| Area | Potential Impact |
|---|---|
| Digital advertising | Levy exposure |
| Publisher relationships | More commercial agreements |
| News distribution | Potential changes in platform strategy |
| Costs | Higher spending on Australian media |
| Negotiating power | Greater leverage for publishers |
| Compliance | Additional regulatory requirements |
For technology companies, the most economically attractive option may be to negotiate agreements rather than simply pay the levy.
Could Platforms Change How They Handle News?
The law could influence how technology companies display, distribute and promote news content in Australia.
If the cost of carrying or facilitating news becomes significant, platforms could reconsider how much prominence they give news stories.
However, the government’s objective is to make commercial news agreements more attractive than reducing news availability.
The outcome will depend partly on how platforms calculate the value of Australian news engagement against the cost of complying with the new framework.
Australian Media Companies Welcome the Legislation
Major Australian media organisations have broadly welcomed the legislation, arguing that sustainable funding is essential for maintaining journalism.
News Corp Australia and Nine Entertainment have supported the government’s efforts to create stronger financial incentives for technology platforms. Media leaders have described the legislation as important for public-interest journalism and the sustainability of newsrooms.
However, there have also been concerns within the media industry about whether the final design will generate enough money to prevent job losses and maintain newsroom staffing levels.
This highlights a key question: how much money will actually reach journalists and newsrooms rather than being absorbed into broader corporate finances?
Big Tech Faces Broader Regulatory Pressure in Australia
The news law is part of a broader Australian effort to regulate powerful technology companies.
Australia has introduced or pursued measures covering online safety, social media, digital competition and advertising.
The government has increasingly argued that large technology platforms should bear greater responsibility for the economic and social effects of their operations.
The news-payment framework therefore has significance beyond the media sector.
Australia Could Influence Other Countries
Australia’s approach is likely to be watched closely by governments in other countries dealing with the same structural problem: traditional journalism is expensive to produce, while digital advertising has shifted toward large technology platforms.
If Australia’s new framework succeeds in generating meaningful funding without causing platforms to withdraw news services, other governments could consider similar mechanisms.
If platforms respond by reducing news visibility or limiting publisher access, however, the Australian experiment could also become a warning for policymakers.
The Bigger Picture
Australia’s new News Bargaining Incentive represents one of the world’s most aggressive attempts to make large technology platforms contribute financially to local journalism. Major platforms with significant Australian operations and more than A$250 million in annual advertising revenue can face a levy of 2.5% of their Australian digital advertising revenue if they fail to establish the required commercial agreements.
The policy is ultimately about bargaining power. Australia’s government believes major technology platforms have become powerful gateways to news while publishers have lost advertising revenue and negotiating leverage. By requiring at least eight commercial deals and offering stronger incentives for smaller media organisations, Canberra is attempting to spread the financial benefits beyond Australia’s largest news companies.
Looking Ahead
The immediate focus will shift from legislation to implementation. Technology companies will need to determine whether negotiating qualifying agreements is preferable to accepting the levy, while publishers will compete for commercial arrangements under the new framework. The eight-deal requirement and 25% cap on the contribution of any single deal could encourage platforms to diversify their agreements across Australia’s media sector.
The longer-term test will be whether the policy actually strengthens Australian journalism without reducing consumers’ access to news. If the framework generates substantial new funding for regional, independent and public-interest journalism, it could become a model for other countries seeking to rebalance the relationship between Big Tech and traditional media. If platforms respond by reducing news distribution, however, Australia could face a new debate over whether the benefits of the policy outweigh its potential consequences for the digital news ecosystem.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
