Flipkart-owned online travel platform Cleartrip reported a 28.1% year-on-year increase in net loss to ₹805 crore in FY2026, even as its operating revenue grew 20.8% to ₹198.3 crore. The company’s total expenses increased 21.9% to ₹1,045.9 crore, while spending on cashbacks and discounts jumped 47.5% to ₹897.5 crore. The results highlight the financial pressure Cleartrip faces as it competes with established travel platforms and attempts to expand its share of India’s online travel market.
The widening loss comes as Cleartrip works toward operational break-even by the end of FY2027. The company is attempting to reduce its dependence on flight bookings by expanding hotels, trains, buses, holiday packages and additional travel services. These categories can offer different revenue and margin opportunities, but the strategy requires investment in customer acquisition, technology and supplier relationships. Cleartrip’s challenge is to turn booking growth into sustainable earnings without relying excessively on discounts to attract customers.
Key Takeaways
- Net loss: Cleartrip’s FY26 loss widened 28.1% to ₹805 crore from ₹628.4 crore in FY25.
- Operating revenue: Revenue increased 20.8% to ₹198.3 crore from ₹164.1 crore.
- Total expenses: Spending rose 21.9% to ₹1,045.9 crore.
- Cashbacks and discounts: These expenses increased 47.5% to ₹897.5 crore.
- Accumulated losses: The company’s accumulated losses reached ₹3,828 crore as of March 31, 2026.
- Parent-company support: Cleartrip borrowed ₹3,964 crore from Flipkart Internet during FY26 and repaid ₹3,653 crore.
- Profitability target: The company is targeting operational break-even by the end of FY2027.
Cleartrip FY26 Financial Results: Revenue Versus Loss
Cleartrip’s FY2026 results show that revenue growth has not yet translated into a reduction in net losses. Operating revenue rose by ₹34.2 crore during the year, but the company continued to carry a substantial expense base.
The difference between revenue growth and expense growth is particularly important. Total expenses increased by ₹187.7 crore, significantly more than the increase in operating revenue. Although operating revenue and total expenses are not the only factors that determine net profit, the gap illustrates the scale of Cleartrip’s current cost structure.
| Financial metric | FY2025 | FY2026 | Year-on-year change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | ₹164.1 crore | ₹198.3 crore | +20.8% |
| Net loss | ₹628.4 crore | ₹805.0 crore | +28.1% |
| Total expenses | ₹858.2 crore | ₹1,045.9 crore | +21.9% |
| Total income, including other income | ₹366.7 crore | ₹241.3 crore | -34.2% |
| Other income | Approximately ₹202.6 crore | ₹43.0 crore | -78.8% |
| Cashbacks and discounts | ₹608.2 crore | ₹897.5 crore | +47.5% |
Source: Cleartrip financial results as reported by Inc42. Figures are rounded; year-on-year percentages are calculated from reported amounts.
One important detail is the decline in other income, which fell to ₹43 crore from approximately ₹202.6 crore. This contributed to the fall in total income, even though operating revenue increased.
The combination of rising operating revenue, higher expenses and lower other income helps explain why Cleartrip’s net loss widened. The company must now demonstrate that its growth strategy can improve the underlying economics of its travel-booking business.
Why Did Cleartrip’s Cashbacks and Discounts Increase 47.5%?
Cashbacks and discounts were among the most significant cost items in Cleartrip’s FY26 results. Spending on these incentives rose to ₹897.5 crore from ₹608.2 crore a year earlier.
Travel-booking platforms frequently use discounts to attract customers, encourage repeat bookings and compete for high-demand routes or hotel reservations. Customers can compare prices across several apps, making promotions an important way to influence where they complete a booking.
However, discounts can become expensive when a platform must continually offer incentives to maintain growth. A customer acquired through a cashback promotion may not return when the incentive disappears, limiting the long-term value of the marketing expenditure.
For Cleartrip, the increase in promotional spending was substantially faster than its 20.8% operating revenue growth. This suggests that the company is spending more on incentives relative to the revenue it generates from its core operations.
The comparison does not prove that every discount is ineffective. Promotions can help build customer awareness, increase bookings and establish relationships with airlines and hotels. The key question is whether those benefits eventually produce enough repeat business and contribution margin to justify the spending.
The cost of attracting customers
Cleartrip’s other expense categories also increased during FY26.
| Expense category | FY2025 | FY2026 | Year-on-year change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advertising and sales promotion | ₹102.2 crore | ₹133.8 crore | +30.9% |
| Employee benefit expenses | ₹239.4 crore | ₹258.1 crore | +7.8% |
| Payment gateway charges | ₹78.7 crore | ₹110.1 crore | +40.0% |
| Commission and brokerage expenses | ₹128.8 crore | ₹171.5 crore | +33.2% |
Source: Inc42’s reporting on Cleartrip’s FY26 financial statements. Figures are rounded.
Advertising and sales promotion expenses rose 30.9%, while payment gateway charges increased 40%. Commission and brokerage expenses also climbed by 33.2%.
These figures show that the cost pressure extends beyond customer discounts. Payment processing, marketing and commissions all contribute to the expense of acquiring and serving bookings.
For Cleartrip, improving profitability will require careful management of these costs alongside efforts to increase revenue per customer and encourage repeat transactions.
Cleartrip Spent ₹5.27 for Every ₹1 of Operating Revenue
One of the clearest ways to understand Cleartrip’s financial position is to compare total expenses with operating revenue.
In FY26, the company recorded ₹1,045.9 crore in total expenses against ₹198.3 crore in operating revenue. That translates to approximately ₹5.27 in total expenses for every ₹1 of operating revenue.
This is a broad expense-to-revenue ratio, not a measure of the cost of fulfilling an individual booking. Total expenses include multiple categories, and operating revenue is not necessarily the same as the gross value of all travel bookings made through the platform.
| Indicator | FY2026 |
|---|---|
| Operating revenue | ₹198.3 crore |
| Total expenses | ₹1,045.9 crore |
| Total expenses per ₹1 of operating revenue | ₹5.27 |
| Difference between total expenses and operating revenue | ₹847.6 crore |
The ratio illustrates why growing bookings alone may not be enough to improve Cleartrip’s financial performance. The company must increase the revenue it retains from transactions while controlling the cost of acquiring and servicing customers.
Online travel platforms typically generate revenue through service charges, commissions, incentives and additional services. The amount retained depends on supplier agreements, pricing, customer incentives and the mix of products sold.
A shift toward more profitable services could improve the ratio over time, but Cleartrip will need to demonstrate that the change is occurring in its financial results.
Flipkart’s Financial Support Remains Important
Cleartrip’s financial statements highlight its dependence on the backing of its parent group. During FY26, the travel platform borrowed ₹3,964 crore from Flipkart Internet Private Limited and repaid ₹3,653 crore. Interest on these loans amounted to ₹130.4 crore for the year.
The company also reported accumulated losses of ₹3,828 crore as of March 31, 2026, up from ₹3,023 crore a year earlier. Its negative net worth widened to ₹3,066 crore from ₹2,262 crore in FY25.
These figures show that Cleartrip is still in a substantial investment phase. Building a competitive travel platform can require sustained spending on technology, marketing, supplier partnerships and customer incentives before the business achieves consistent profitability.
Cleartrip’s financial statements said its ability to continue as a going concern depended on the success of its operations and access to funding. The company also disclosed a commitment and letter of financial support from Flipkart Internet.
That support provides an important financial backstop, but it does not remove the need for Cleartrip to improve its operating performance. A long-term path toward self-sustaining operations would reduce its dependence on continued parent-company funding.
Why Cleartrip Is Expanding Beyond Flight Bookings
Cleartrip has historically relied heavily on air-ticket bookings. Flights can generate substantial transaction volumes, but the revenue retained from each booking can be limited by competitive pricing and supplier economics.
The company is therefore attempting to expand into hotels, alternative accommodation, trains, buses, holiday packages and additional services. The goal is to become a broader travel platform rather than an app used primarily to book flights.
Cleartrip’s management has said non-air services accounted for approximately 27% of its business, up from around 10% roughly 18 months earlier. It is targeting a contribution of around 40% by the end of 2027, according to reporting by Business Standard.
Hotels and ground transport can create opportunities to generate different types of commissions and service revenue. Holiday packages and ancillary services can also help the platform serve more of a customer’s travel needs through a single interface.
The strategy is not without challenges. Hotel bookings require strong supplier relationships, reliable inventory and competitive prices. Alternative accommodation is fragmented, while trains and buses operate under different commercial arrangements from air travel.
Cleartrip must therefore build these businesses while managing the costs of marketing and customer acquisition. The expansion will improve profitability only if the additional revenue and margins justify the investment.
Can Cleartrip Reach Operational Break-Even by FY27-End?
Cleartrip has stated that it is targeting operational break-even by the end of FY2027. The target implies that the company expects improvements in its business mix and cost structure to narrow the gap between revenue and operating expenses.
The planned shift toward hotels, trains, buses and holiday packages is central to that objective. Management has also highlighted the potential of premium services and ancillary products, including insurance and flexible booking options.
However, operational break-even is not necessarily the same as achieving net profit. Finance costs, depreciation, amortisation, taxes and other items can affect the final result even if core operations become more balanced.
The FY26 figures indicate that Cleartrip has significant work to do. Revenue grew, but promotional spending rose faster, total expenses increased and the company’s accumulated losses continued to expand.
To make progress, the company will need to track more than gross booking volumes. Relevant indicators include revenue per booking, repeat customer rates, discount spending as a share of revenue, contribution margins by category and the cost of acquiring new customers.
If Cleartrip can grow its non-air businesses while moderating promotional spending, the economics may improve. If customer growth continues to depend heavily on expensive incentives, achieving the stated target could prove more difficult.
What Cleartrip’s Results Mean for India’s Online Travel Market
Cleartrip’s financial performance reflects the competitive environment in India’s online travel industry. Digital platforms compete on price, convenience, customer service, payment options and the breadth of available travel products.
Customers benefit from the ability to compare fares and accommodation across services. For platforms, however, that transparency can create pressure to offer discounts or invest in loyalty programmes to retain users.
The challenge is particularly acute for businesses that are still building market share. Marketing and promotional expenses can rise quickly when companies try to acquire customers in a crowded market.
Cleartrip’s strategy suggests that expanding into additional travel categories is one way to address the problem. A customer who books flights, hotels, buses and holiday packages through the same platform may have more reasons to return, potentially improving the economics of customer acquisition.
Yet diversification does not automatically produce profitability. Each category brings its own supplier costs, operational requirements and competitive pressures. Cleartrip will need to show that the additional services create sustainable revenue rather than simply increasing the number of products it offers.
The Bigger Picture
Cleartrip’s FY26 results show the difference between growing a travel business and building a profitable one. Operating revenue increased by more than one-fifth, but losses widened as expenses rose and the company spent substantially more on cashbacks and discounts. Financial support from Flipkart has helped sustain the platform’s expansion, but accumulated losses and a negative net worth underline the importance of improving its underlying economics.
The company’s next phase depends on whether it can reduce reliance on incentives, expand higher-margin non-air services and generate more revenue from existing customers. Its operational break-even target for FY27-end provides a clear benchmark, but progress will need to be measured through cost control, category-level margins and cash requirements—not revenue growth alone.
Looking Ahead
Cleartrip is expected to continue investing in hotels, alternative accommodation, trains, buses and holiday packages as it attempts to diversify its revenue base. The company has also indicated that it wants non-air services to account for a substantially larger share of its business by the end of 2027. These initiatives could improve its financial performance if they increase customer engagement and contribution margins without requiring proportionately higher promotional spending.
Investors and industry observers will watch whether Cleartrip can narrow its losses, reduce its dependence on parent-company funding and meet its operational break-even target. The next set of financial results should provide a clearer indication of whether the company’s growth strategy is beginning to deliver better unit economics. Until then, its FY26 performance highlights both the opportunity in India’s online travel market and the high cost of competing for customers.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was Cleartrip’s net loss in FY26?
Cleartrip reported a net loss of ₹805 crore in FY2026, up 28.1% from ₹628.4 crore in FY2025.
2. How much did Cleartrip’s revenue grow in FY26?
Operating revenue increased 20.8% year-on-year to ₹198.3 crore, compared with ₹164.1 crore in the previous financial year.
3. Why did Cleartrip’s losses increase despite revenue growth?
Total expenses increased 21.9% to ₹1,045.9 crore. Cashbacks and discounts rose 47.5% to ₹897.5 crore, while marketing, payment gateway and commission expenses also increased.
4. Is Cleartrip owned by Flipkart?
Yes. Flipkart acquired Cleartrip in 2021, and the online travel platform continues to receive financial support from its parent group.
5. When does Cleartrip expect to break even?
Cleartrip has stated that it is targeting operational break-even by the end of FY2027. That target is a company objective, not a guarantee of profitability.
6. How does Cleartrip plan to reduce its losses?
The company is expanding hotels, trains, buses, alternative accommodation, holiday packages and ancillary services. It is also seeking to improve the business mix and reduce dependence on discount-led customer acquisition.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
