Coca-Cola’s $5.1 billion acquisition of Costa Coffee in 2018 has struggled to deliver the growth the beverage giant originally expected. The deal was designed to give Coca-Cola a strong position in the global coffee market by combining Costa’s café business and coffee expertise with Coca-Cola’s international distribution network. Nearly eight years later, expensive vending-machine expansion, weak brand recognition in the United States and pandemic-related disruptions have limited the strategy’s results.
The acquisition was intended to help Coca-Cola expand beyond its traditional strength in cold beverages and capture opportunities in a global coffee and tea market worth hundreds of billions of dollars. The company planned to scale Costa through physical cafés, automated espresso machines and ready-to-drink coffee products. However, the anticipated distribution advantages have proved harder to achieve than expected, leaving Costa largely dependent on its established café business in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Key Takeaways
- Coca-Cola acquired Costa Coffee from Whitbread in 2018 for approximately $5.1 billion.
- The deal aimed to expand Coca-Cola’s presence in coffee through cafés, vending machines and ready-to-drink beverages.
- Costa’s automated coffee machines proved more expensive and complicated to scale through Coca-Cola’s bottling network.
- The brand has struggled to establish a significant presence in the US ready-to-drink coffee market.
- Pandemic-related café closures disrupted Costa’s traditional revenue stream in 2020.
- Coca-Cola previously explored selling Costa but abandoned that process after bids fell short of expectations.
- Recent reports suggest the company has reconsidered strategic options, although Coca-Cola says it remains committed to the business.
Why Coca-Cola Bought Costa Coffee for $5.1 Billion
Coca-Cola announced its agreement to acquire Costa Coffee from British hospitality group Whitbread in August 2018 and completed the transaction later that year. The acquisition was valued at approximately $5.1 billion.
At the time, Costa operated in more than 30 countries and had a substantial network of cafés, automated coffee machines and at-home coffee products. Coca-Cola viewed the business as an established platform that could help it enter a growing beverage category.
The strategic logic was straightforward: Coca-Cola already had extensive relationships with retailers, restaurants, convenience stores and distributors worldwide. Costa could potentially use that infrastructure to expand its coffee products more rapidly than it could as a standalone company.
The plan also reflected changing consumer preferences. Coffee had become an important category across cafés, supermarkets, convenience stores and offices, while ready-to-drink coffee offered beverage companies an opportunity to sell products through the same channels used for packaged soft drinks.
Coca-Cola expected its distribution expertise and marketing capabilities to help Costa reach new customers. The challenge was translating those advantages into a business model that could grow profitably across different markets and sales channels.
Costa Express Machines Failed to Scale as Expected
One of the central elements of Coca-Cola’s strategy was Costa Express, its automated coffee vending operation.
The idea was to place espresso-based coffee machines in locations such as convenience stores, universities, workplaces and transport hubs. These machines would allow customers to buy Costa-branded coffee without visiting a traditional café.
Coca-Cola believed its experience in distributing beverages and maintaining equipment across a large retail network would make expansion relatively straightforward. In practice, the machines presented different operational requirements from conventional cold-drink dispensers.
Espresso machines are more complicated to install and maintain. They require appropriate equipment, regular cleaning, reliable supplies and servicing to maintain consistent drink quality. Their placement can also involve more coordination with retailers than a standard beverage refrigerator.
These challenges made expansion more expensive and difficult for Coca-Cola’s bottling partners. As a result, the company did not achieve the scale it had anticipated from the vending-machine strategy.
The experience illustrates a limitation of distribution-based acquisitions: an established network can help a business reach new customers, but it cannot automatically eliminate the operational differences between product categories.
Coca-Cola Lost Ground in Ready-to-Drink Coffee
Another important part of the acquisition strategy was expanding Costa into ready-to-drink coffee, a market that includes packaged iced coffee and other beverages sold through retail outlets.
Coca-Cola hoped to use its global distribution system to make Costa products available alongside its established drinks. However, the company struggled to establish the brand as a major competitor in the United States.
The US market already had strong competitors and established retail relationships. Starbucks-branded Frappuccino products, distributed through a partnership between Starbucks and PepsiCo, have maintained a prominent position in the country’s ready-to-drink coffee segment.
Costa, meanwhile, remained relatively unfamiliar to many American consumers compared with Starbucks and other established coffee brands.
The result was a gap between the scale Coca-Cola hoped to achieve and Costa’s actual reach in the US market. The acquisition gave Coca-Cola a recognised British coffee brand, but building equivalent recognition and distribution in another country required more than access to retail channels.
The Pandemic Hit Costa’s Café Business
The COVID-19 pandemic created another major setback. Lockdowns and restrictions forced cafés to close across the United Kingdom and other markets, sharply reducing Costa’s ability to generate revenue through in-person sales.
Unlike Coca-Cola’s core packaged-beverage operations, which could continue supplying retailers and supermarkets, Costa’s café business depended heavily on customers visiting physical locations.
The disruption exposed the operating costs associated with running a large café network. Shops require staff, rent, equipment and maintenance, including during periods when customer traffic falls sharply.
Coca-Cola subsequently explored ways to reduce the burden of operating Costa’s cafés, including encouraging franchisees to take over more locations. However, some franchisees reportedly considered the proposed prices too high, particularly for shops that had been closed and required repairs.
The pandemic was an external shock rather than a failure of the original acquisition plan alone. Nevertheless, it delayed expansion and reinforced the difficulties of operating a large physical retail business within a company historically built around beverage production and distribution.
Costa’s Financial and Strategic Challenges
Coca-Cola’s acquisition has faced two connected challenges: generating sufficient growth from Costa and determining how the business fits within the wider corporate portfolio.
Coca-Cola operates at enormous scale, selling beverages through bottlers and distribution partners around the world. Costa, by contrast, has a significant retail footprint and must manage the costs associated with cafés, staff, equipment and individual locations.
That difference makes Costa’s economics distinct from Coca-Cola’s traditional beverage-concentrate business.
The acquisition has not been irrelevant to Coca-Cola’s overall operations, but the expected strategic multiplier effect has not materialised to the extent management originally anticipated. Former executives and industry observers have pointed to the difficulties of integrating the two business models.
The company has also been trimming costs and working to improve Costa’s performance. Recent revenue trends have reportedly improved, suggesting that the business continues to have opportunities despite its earlier setbacks.
Costa Coffee acquisition: expectations versus outcomes
| Strategic objective | What happened |
|---|---|
| Expand Coca-Cola into coffee | Costa provided an established international coffee brand and café network |
| Scale automated coffee machines | Installation and maintenance proved more complicated and expensive than expected |
| Build a major US presence | Costa remained relatively little-known in the US coffee market |
| Expand ready-to-drink coffee | Costa did not gain the anticipated position against established competitors |
| Benefit from Coca-Cola’s distribution | The network helped, but did not remove the operational challenges of coffee retail |
| Deliver stronger returns | The acquisition has fallen short of the original expectations, prompting strategic reassessment |
Could Coca-Cola Sell Costa Coffee?
Coca-Cola previously explored selling Costa Coffee after the business struggled to meet expectations. A sale process in 2025 attracted interest from private equity firms, but the company ended discussions after bids reportedly fell below expectations. Reuters reported in January 2026 that the sale process had been halted.
In October 2026, Semafor reported that Coca-Cola was again exploring a potential sale. That report suggested the company was reconsidering its options after the earlier process failed to produce an acceptable transaction.
However, a renewed sale process has not been confirmed as a completed transaction. Coca-Cola told Moneycontrol that it was not in the market to sell Costa, adding that coffee remained important to its broader beverage strategy and that recent actions were delivering positive results.
The distinction matters: exploring strategic options does not necessarily mean a company has decided to sell an asset. Coca-Cola could continue investing in Costa, restructure the business, expand franchising or consider a transaction if it receives an acceptable offer.
Any potential sale would also depend on valuation, the business’s recent performance and the interest of prospective buyers.
The Bigger Picture
Coca-Cola’s Costa Coffee experience highlights the risks involved when a company enters a new category through a major acquisition. A well-known brand and a large distribution network can provide a starting advantage, but success still depends on customer demand, operating costs, local competition and the economics of each sales channel.
The deal also illustrates the difference between packaged beverages and café retail. Coca-Cola’s traditional model relies heavily on selling beverage concentrates and working with bottling partners, while Costa must manage customer-facing outlets, staff and equipment. Combining these businesses creates opportunities, but it also introduces operational complexity that distribution scale alone cannot solve.
FAQs
1. How much did Coca-Cola pay for Costa Coffee?
Coca-Cola acquired Costa Coffee from Whitbread in 2018 for approximately $5.1 billion.
2. Why has the Costa Coffee acquisition fallen short of expectations?
The expansion strategy faced several obstacles, including costly vending-machine deployment, limited US brand recognition, strong ready-to-drink coffee competitors and pandemic-related café closures.
3. Why did Coca-Cola want to enter the coffee market?
The company wanted to diversify beyond its traditional cold-beverage business and use Costa’s brand, café network and coffee expertise to capture opportunities across cafés, vending machines and packaged coffee products.
4. Is Coca-Cola selling Costa Coffee?
A previous sale process was halted in late 2025 after bids fell short of expectations. A report in October 2026 said Coca-Cola was again exploring strategic options, but the company has stated that it is not in the market to sell Costa.
5. Does Costa Coffee remain important to Coca-Cola?
Coca-Cola has said coffee remains an important part of its total beverage strategy. Costa also gives the company an established position in cafés and coffee products, even though the acquisition has not delivered the growth originally anticipated.
Looking Ahead
Costa’s future under Coca-Cola will depend on whether operational changes can produce stronger returns and make the brand more competitive across its core markets. Cost reductions, improved café performance, franchising and more focused product development could support the business, while expansion into new markets would require a clearer path to profitability.
The broader lesson for Coca-Cola is that entering a new beverage category requires more than buying a recognised brand. Distribution, customer familiarity and product innovation must be supported by a business model suited to the category. Whether Coca-Cola ultimately retains Costa or pursues another strategic option, the acquisition will remain a case study in the opportunities and limitations of diversification through large-scale deals.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
