India’s food safety regulator has proposed maximum residue limits for two pesticides used in agriculture, introducing draft standards for acetamiprid and imidacloprid in tea. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has proposed a limit of 20 milligrams per kilogram for acetamiprid and 50 milligrams per kilogram for imidacloprid. The draft amendment was published in the Gazette of India on October 16, 2026, and is open for stakeholder comments for 60 days.
The proposal aims to establish clearer benchmarks for pesticide residue testing and enforcement across India’s tea supply chain. According to the Health Ministry, the limits reflect scientific assessments, international regulatory practices and the need to protect tea crops against pests. The rules are still in draft form, however, and should not be interpreted as final requirements or as evidence that tea currently sold in India is unsafe.
Key Takeaways
- Acetamiprid limit: FSSAI proposes a maximum residue level of 20 parts per million (ppm) in tea.
- Imidacloprid limit: The proposed maximum is 50 ppm.
- Draft status: The amendment was published in the Gazette on October 16, 2026, and remains subject to consultation and finalisation.
- Consultation period: Stakeholders have 60 days to submit objections or suggestions.
- Purpose: The proposal aims to clarify testing, compliance and enforcement requirements while accounting for crop-protection needs.
- International comparison: The government says the proposed acetamiprid limit is lower than the corresponding limits cited for Japan and the United States.
- Consumer implication: A maximum residue limit is a regulatory threshold, not proof that every tea product contains the pesticide or is unsafe.
What Has FSSAI Proposed?
The draft amendment to the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011, introduces specific maximum residue limits (MRLs) for two pesticides in tea.
| Pesticide | Proposed maximum residue limit | Equivalent measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Acetamiprid | 20 mg/kg | 20 ppm |
| Imidacloprid | 50 mg/kg | 50 ppm |
Source: FSSAI draft amendment published in the Gazette of India on October 16, 2026. These figures are proposed limits and are not yet finalised requirements.
The proposal provides numerical thresholds that can be used by food businesses, testing laboratories and enforcement authorities when assessing compliance. Clearly defined limits can help standardise how residue levels are measured and interpreted.
The draft does not, by itself, establish that every tea sample must contain these pesticides. Rather, it sets out the maximum residue concentrations being proposed for regulatory purposes.
The final rules may depend on the consultation process and any changes made before the amendment is notified as final.
What Are Maximum Residue Limits?
A maximum residue limit is the highest concentration of a pesticide residue permitted in a particular food commodity under the applicable regulatory framework.
Pesticides are used in agriculture to control insects, weeds and other threats to crops. When they are applied, small amounts of residue may remain on or in agricultural products. Regulators establish residue limits using information such as pesticide-use patterns, residue studies, dietary exposure assessments and relevant safety considerations.
An MRL is therefore a regulatory benchmark, not a direct measurement of how much pesticide a person consumes in a cup of tea.
The amount of residue in a finished product depends on several factors, including how the pesticide was used, the concentration remaining in the harvested crop, processing methods and the quantity of the product consumed.
Residue limits also differ by commodity because pesticide use and exposure can vary between crops. A limit for tea should not automatically be applied to vegetables, fruits or other foods.
Understanding the proposed numbers
One part per million is equivalent to one milligram of a substance in one kilogram of material. Accordingly, the proposed 20 ppm limit for acetamiprid means 20 milligrams per kilogram of tea, while 50 ppm for imidacloprid means 50 milligrams per kilogram.
These figures describe concentrations in the commodity being regulated. They do not mean that a consumer receives that amount of pesticide when drinking a cup of tea.
Brewing, the quantity of dry tea used, the amount transferred into the liquid and the volume consumed all affect dietary exposure. Assessing health risk requires more than comparing a residue limit with the amount of tea in a cup.
Why Are Acetamiprid and Imidacloprid Used?
Acetamiprid and imidacloprid belong to the neonicotinoid class of insecticides. They act on the nervous systems of insects and are used in agriculture to control certain pests.
Tea cultivation can face insect-related crop losses that affect leaf quality, yield and commercial value. Farmers use pest-management measures to protect production, although the appropriate pesticide and application method depend on the crop, pest and applicable rules.
The tea industry has sought clearer regulatory guidance on residues of these chemicals. A clearly defined MRL can help growers and processors understand the standard they must meet, while providing laboratories and regulators with a reference point for testing.
However, establishing a residue limit does not mean unrestricted pesticide use is permitted. Farmers must still follow applicable registration conditions, approved uses, application instructions and other relevant requirements.
The proposal also does not replace the need for responsible pesticide management. Appropriate application, observing required intervals before harvesting and following good agricultural practices remain important for limiting residues.
How India’s Proposal Compares With International Standards
The Health Ministry has highlighted international comparisons as part of its explanation for the draft limits.
According to the government’s statement, India’s proposed acetamiprid MRL of 20 ppm is lower than the corresponding limits cited for Japan, at 30 ppm, and the United States, at 50 ppm. The proposed imidacloprid limit has also been developed with reference to international Codex standards.
| Jurisdiction or reference | Acetamiprid in tea |
|---|---|
| India — proposed limit | 20 ppm |
| Japan — limit cited by the Indian government | 30 ppm |
| United States — limit cited by the Indian government | 50 ppm |
These are the comparisons stated by the Indian government. Regulatory limits can change, and comparisons should be checked against the relevant jurisdiction’s current official standards before being used for compliance decisions.
International differences do not automatically establish that one country’s tea is safer than another’s. MRLs can reflect differences in authorised agricultural practices, residue data, exposure assessments and regulatory methodologies.
The comparison is relevant to exporters because tea businesses serving multiple markets may need to meet different destination-country requirements. A product compliant with one country’s rules is not necessarily compliant with every other country’s rules.
For Indian producers, the final standards could influence how residue testing is organised for domestic sales and export consignments.
What the Draft Means for Tea Growers and Businesses
The proposed limits could affect several stages of the tea supply chain, from cultivation to processing, testing and distribution.
For growers, clearer standards could help inform pesticide selection and application practices. Farmers may need to review how they use the two chemicals once the applicable requirements are finalised, particularly where residue testing indicates a risk of exceeding the permitted levels.
For processors and manufacturers, defined thresholds can support supplier checks and quality-control procedures. Businesses may review procurement practices, testing schedules and documentation to ensure that incoming tea meets the relevant standards.
For laboratories, numerical limits provide clearer benchmarks for analytical testing and compliance reporting. Reliable measurement is important because regulatory decisions depend on accurate sampling, suitable testing methods and consistent interpretation of results.
For enforcement authorities, the proposed limits could provide a more consistent basis for assessing samples and determining whether regulatory action is necessary once the rules take effect.
The eventual effect on costs will depend on the final provisions, compliance requirements and how much additional testing or changes in agricultural practices are needed.
What Does This Mean for Consumers?
The announcement does not mean consumers need to stop drinking tea or that all tea currently available contains harmful pesticide residues.
The proposal is about setting regulatory thresholds for two pesticide residues. It does not report that a particular brand, batch or tea product has exceeded those limits.
Consumers should also distinguish between a pesticide’s presence and the level of exposure. Food-safety assessments consider the concentration detected, the amount consumed and other factors relevant to potential health effects.
Once standards are finalised, they can support more consistent monitoring of tea products. However, consumer confidence also depends on effective sampling, laboratory capacity, transparent enforcement and action when products fail to meet applicable requirements.
For now, the draft should be understood as a regulatory proposal rather than a product recall, a warning against tea consumption or a finding that Indian tea is unsafe.
Why the 60-Day Consultation Matters
FSSAI has published the amendment as a draft and invited objections and suggestions from stakeholders. The consultation period is 60 days from the date the Gazette notification became available to the public.
This process allows affected parties to provide information before the proposed standards are finalised. Tea growers, processors, exporters, pesticide experts, testing laboratories and consumer groups may have evidence or concerns relevant to the final limits.
Stakeholders could raise questions about residue data, testing methods, agricultural practices, international trade requirements and the practical ability of businesses to comply.
The regulator can consider the submissions before deciding whether to retain, revise or otherwise modify the draft provisions. The proposal should therefore not be treated as a final rule until the appropriate notification is issued and its effective date is established.
The Bigger Picture
FSSAI’s proposed tea residue limits are part of a broader effort to make food-safety requirements more clearly defined and science-based. Specific thresholds can improve consistency in testing and enforcement while giving businesses a more concrete standard to follow. The challenge is to balance consumer protection with agricultural realities, including the need to manage pests and maintain crop productivity.
The proposal’s practical impact will depend on the final limits, the implementation timeline and the effectiveness of monitoring. For tea producers, it could mean clearer compliance benchmarks and closer attention to residue management. For consumers, the important distinction is that proposed limits are not evidence of widespread contamination; they are part of the process for defining and enforcing food-safety standards.
Looking Ahead
The next step is the completion of the 60-day stakeholder consultation and FSSAI’s consideration of the submissions received. The regulator may then finalise the amendment and specify how the new limits will apply. Until that happens, the proposed 20 ppm acetamiprid and 50 ppm imidacloprid thresholds should be described as draft standards.
For India’s tea industry, the outcome could influence testing procedures, agricultural practices and compliance planning. For consumers, effective implementation will matter more than the announcement alone: clear rules must be supported by reliable testing, consistent enforcement and transparent communication about what residue results mean for food safety.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What pesticide residue limits has FSSAI proposed for tea?
FSSAI has proposed 20 ppm for acetamiprid and 50 ppm for imidacloprid in tea.
2. Are the new limits already final?
No. The amendment was published as a draft on October 16, 2026, and is subject to a 60-day consultation and finalisation process.
3. Does this mean Indian tea is unsafe?
No. The proposal does not establish that all tea contains these pesticides or that products currently on sale are unsafe. It proposes regulatory thresholds for residue concentrations.
4. What is an MRL?
A maximum residue limit is the highest concentration of a pesticide residue permitted in a food commodity under the applicable regulations.
5. Why are these pesticides used?
Acetamiprid and imidacloprid are insecticides used to control certain agricultural pests. Their use must comply with applicable authorisations and agricultural practices.
6. What happens after the consultation period?
FSSAI will consider stakeholder submissions before deciding how to proceed with the draft amendment. The final rules and their effective date will depend on the subsequent regulatory notification.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
