India could have a competitive homegrown smartphone brand by the middle of 2027, Electronics and IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said, as the government moves to shift the country’s mobile-phone industry beyond manufacturing for overseas brands toward Indian-owned products and intellectual property. Three Indian companies are currently in discussions with the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to participate in the government’s new Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS), although their names have not been disclosed.
The initiative is backed by a ₹62,500 crore scheme covering FY2026-27 through FY2030-31. The programme provides incentives for large-scale mobile manufacturing as well as Indian brands, with the government specifically emphasizing domestic design, research and development and sourcing. Vaishnaw said the government wants participating companies to develop their own designs rather than simply assemble devices designed elsewhere.
India Targets A Homegrown Smartphone Brand By 2027
Vaishnaw said three Indian players are currently being encouraged to develop design options under the Indian-brand segment of the MPMS. The minister said the government expects a globally competitive Indian mobile-phone brand to emerge by around the middle of 2027.
The timeline builds on comments Vaishnaw made earlier in 2026, when he said India could see homegrown mobile brands within 18 months. The latest announcement provides a more specific target and comes after the government formally notified the new manufacturing scheme.
Key Numbers Behind India’s Smartphone Brand Push
| Indicator | Latest Figure |
|---|---|
| Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme outlay | ₹62,500 crore |
| Scheme period | FY2026-27 to FY2030-31 |
| Indian companies in discussions | 3 |
| Target for competitive homegrown brand | Mid-2027 |
| Indian-brand sales incentive | 5% of eligible sales |
| Additional design/R&D incentive | 3% |
| Potential domestic sourcing incentive | Up to 1.5% |
| Chinese brands’ reported market share | About 55% |
The scheme is designed to support not only manufacturing volumes but also the development of Indian-owned brands with domestic design and R&D capabilities.
₹62,500 Crore Scheme Is At The Centre Of The Plan
The MPMS represents a major shift in India’s electronics policy. Earlier manufacturing incentives helped India establish itself as a major location for smartphone assembly. The new programme is intended to capture more value within India by supporting domestic brands, component sourcing and product development.
The scheme has two broad target segments: large mobile-phone manufacturing companies and Indian mobile-phone brands. It became effective from April 1, 2026, and will operate for five years.
How The Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme Works
| Incentive / Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Total scheme outlay | ₹62,500 crore |
| Duration | 5 years |
| Indian-brand incentive | 5% of eligible sales |
| Design and R&D incentive | Additional 3% |
| Domestic sourcing incentive | Up to 1.5% |
| Localisation requirement for sourcing incentive | 25% |
| Indian ownership requirement | More than 51% Indian citizen shareholding |
| Management | Controlled by Indian citizens |
| IP and trademarks | To be held in India |
| Design/R&D | In-house capabilities required |
The additional incentives are intended to encourage companies to invest in capabilities that go beyond assembly. Eligibility rules also seek to ensure that supported brands have meaningful Indian ownership, control and intellectual property.
Government Wants Original Indian Designs
One of the clearest messages from Vaishnaw is that the programme is not intended simply to create another assembly operation.
The minister said the three companies being considered have been asked to develop their own designs, and that the government will approve participation in the Indian-brand segment only when companies demonstrate their own design capabilities.
That requirement matters because smartphone manufacturing involves several distinct layers. A company can manufacture a device domestically while still depending heavily on foreign companies for product design, software, components and intellectual property.
India’s new policy is attempting to move further up that value chain.
From Assembly To Brand Ownership
| Area | Traditional Manufacturing Focus | New Policy Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | Major focus | Continues |
| Product design | Often external | Indian-owned design encouraged |
| R&D | Limited | Incentivised |
| Intellectual property | Often foreign-owned | Indian ownership required |
| Component sourcing | Import-heavy | Higher domestic sourcing |
| Branding | International brands | Indian brands |
| Exports | Manufacturing-led | Brand and manufacturing-led |
This transition could allow India to capture more economic value from each smartphone manufactured in the country.
India Already Has A Large Smartphone Manufacturing Base
India has made significant progress in smartphone production over the past decade. The country now manufactures almost every smartphone sold domestically, according to an analysis by The Indian Express, but most of the leading brands remain foreign-owned.
That distinction is central to the government’s new strategy.
India has successfully attracted companies to manufacture devices for global brands, but manufacturing under a foreign brand does not give domestic companies ownership of the product, software ecosystem or customer relationship.
The next objective is therefore to create companies that can own the brand as well as increasingly own the underlying technology.
Indian Smartphone Brands Have Lost Ground
India previously had several prominent domestic smartphone brands, including Micromax, Karbonn and Lava.
These companies gained significant market share during the early smartphone era but struggled as Chinese manufacturers such as Xiaomi, Vivo and Oppo expanded rapidly in India. Aggressive pricing, faster product cycles and greater investment in technology and marketing helped international competitors gain ground.
The current government push comes in a substantially different environment.
India now has a larger electronics manufacturing ecosystem, stronger component supply chains and greater experience producing smartphones at scale. That could provide new domestic entrants with a stronger foundation than earlier Indian brands had.
India’s Smartphone Brand Landscape
| Period / Development | Market Situation |
|---|---|
| Early smartphone era | Indian brands had significant presence |
| Expansion of Chinese brands | Micromax, Karbonn and others lost market share |
| Recent years | India became a major manufacturing and export hub |
| 2026 | Government launches ₹62,500 crore MPMS |
| Mid-2027 target | Competitive Indian brand expected |
The challenge is that today’s smartphone market is significantly more sophisticated than it was when earlier Indian brands were at their peak.
Existing Indian Brands Are Already Operating
The government’s target should not necessarily be interpreted as India having no domestic smartphone brands today.
Lava is an established Indian smartphone company, while AI+ is another newer homegrown brand. AI+ said in July 2026 that it had sold more than 2 million smartphones since its launch in July 2025 and was targeting ₹7,500 crore in revenue for FY2026-27.
The government’s reference to a “competitive” homegrown brand therefore appears to be focused on creating a company capable of competing at a much larger scale, rather than simply introducing the first Indian-owned smartphone company.
Existing Domestic Players
| Brand / Company | Current Position |
|---|---|
| Lava | Established Indian smartphone brand |
| AI+ / NxtQuantum Shift Technologies | Newer Indian smartphone brand |
| Micromax | Former major domestic smartphone brand |
| Karbonn | Former major domestic smartphone brand |
| New MPMS participants | Three companies currently in discussions |
The identities of the three companies currently discussing participation under the Indian-brand segment have not been publicly disclosed.
Design And R&D Could Be The Biggest Differentiator
For a new Indian brand to compete with Apple, Samsung and major Chinese manufacturers, assembly capacity alone will not be sufficient.
Smartphone competition increasingly depends on camera systems, processors, displays, battery technology, software updates, artificial intelligence features and industrial design.
The MPMS therefore provides an additional 3% incentive for eligible sales linked to design and R&D. The government is effectively trying to make product development a central part of the manufacturing strategy.
Areas Indian Brands Need To Build
| Capability | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Industrial design | Product differentiation |
| Camera technology | Major consumer buying factor |
| Software | User experience and ecosystem |
| AI features | Increasing smartphone differentiator |
| R&D | Proprietary technology |
| Supply chain | Cost and component availability |
| After-sales service | Customer retention |
| Global distribution | International scale |
Building these capabilities will require significantly more investment than simply establishing an assembly line.
AI Could Give Indian Brands An Opportunity
Artificial intelligence could provide a potential area of differentiation for new Indian smartphone companies.
Modern smartphones increasingly use AI for photography, translation, voice interaction, search, productivity and on-device personalization. An Indian company could potentially differentiate itself by developing features around Indian languages and local consumer requirements.
However, competing in AI will also require access to capable processors, software engineers and large technology investments.
The opportunity is therefore closely connected to the government’s wider semiconductor and electronics strategy.
India Wants More Domestic Components
The MPMS also seeks to encourage domestic sourcing.
The scheme provides an additional incentive of up to 1.5% for domestic sourcing of key components and sub-assemblies, subject to a 25% localization requirement.
This is important because a smartphone’s value is spread across numerous components, including displays, memory, camera modules, batteries, sensors, processors and connectivity components.
Increasing local sourcing could reduce India’s dependence on imported parts while creating opportunities for domestic component manufacturers.
Smartphone Value Chain
| Component / Capability | Strategic Importance |
|---|---|
| Display | Major device cost and quality factor |
| Processor | Performance and AI capability |
| Memory | Storage and application performance |
| Camera modules | Photography and video |
| Battery | Device endurance |
| Sensors | Connectivity and device functionality |
| Software | User experience |
| Assembly | Final product manufacturing |
| R&D | Product differentiation and IP |
A deeper domestic supply chain would allow Indian brands to capture more value while potentially reducing exposure to currency fluctuations and international supply disruptions.
Exports Could Become The Bigger Goal
The government’s ambition extends beyond selling phones in India.
A globally competitive Indian smartphone brand could eventually export devices to international markets, allowing India to capture value from branding, product development and intellectual property rather than only from manufacturing.
This would complement India’s growing role as an electronics manufacturing and export hub.
India’s earlier manufacturing push has already attracted major international companies, while the new strategy seeks to add domestic ownership to that manufacturing ecosystem.
The Scale Challenge Remains Significant
The smartphone market is one of the world’s most competitive consumer-electronics industries.
A new entrant must compete on price, specifications, software, distribution, marketing, financing and after-sales support. Established global brands have enormous advantages in procurement, R&D and brand recognition.
The three companies currently considering the MPMS will therefore have to use government incentives as a foundation rather than as a substitute for private investment.
The difference between manufacturing a phone and building a successful global smartphone company remains substantial.
The Bigger Picture
India’s smartphone strategy is entering a new phase. The country has already built substantial manufacturing capacity, but the government’s new objective is to ensure that more of the value created by that industry accrues to Indian companies through domestic brands, design, R&D, intellectual property and component production.
The ₹62,500 crore MPMS gives that ambition a significant financial framework, while the government’s mid-2027 target provides a near-term milestone. Yet India’s existing domestic brands show that simply having an Indian name is not enough. The eventual winner will need to combine technology, design, software, manufacturing scale and global distribution to compete with established players.
Looking Ahead
The next major development will be the selection and approval of Indian companies under the MPMS brand segment. With three players currently in discussions, the government has already moved from broad policy ambitions toward identifying potential participants. The success of the programme will depend on whether those companies can develop original products, build meaningful R&D capabilities and achieve sufficient scale by 2027.
For India’s electronics industry, the longer-term goal is bigger than a single smartphone brand. The government wants India to move from being primarily a manufacturing destination for global brands to becoming a country that creates globally competitive consumer-technology companies of its own. If the strategy succeeds, smartphones could become an important test case for whether India’s manufacturing growth can translate into domestic intellectual property, brands and higher-value technology businesses.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
