Sequoia Capital and Peak XV Partners have reduced their holdings in Honasa Consumer, the parent company of Mamaearth, through open-market transactions, bringing renewed attention to the ownership structure of one of India’s best-known beauty and personal-care companies. Sequoia sold about 0.76% of Honasa, taking its holding down to 2.68%, while Peak XV sold about 3.3%, leaving it with roughly 11.5%.
The transactions took place on September 29, 2026, at around ₹450 per share. Together, Sequoia and Peak XV sold more than 4% of Honasa’s equity for nearly ₹597 crore, based on the disclosed transaction values. The selling came after reports of a larger proposed block transaction involving these investors and Redwood Trust, although the final disclosed trades identified Sequoia and Peak XV as the major sellers.
Key takeaways
- Sequoia Capital Global Growth Fund III sold 25.02 lakh Honasa shares, or 0.76% of the company.
- The transaction was executed at ₹450 per share for about ₹112.6 crore.
- Sequoia’s holding fell from 3.44% at the end of June 2026 to 2.68%.
- Peak XV Partners Investments VI sold 1.07 crore shares, or about 3.3%.
- Peak XV received about ₹484.2 crore from the transaction.
- Its holding fell from roughly 14.8% to about 11.5%.
- Honasa shares fell 5.24% to ₹441.65 on September 29 after the block transactions.
- The company’s Q1 FY27 revenue rose 27% to ₹755.9 crore, while net profit more than doubled to ₹90.4 crore.
- The stake sales do not by themselves indicate that Sequoia or Peak XV has lost confidence in Honasa; they are secondary-market transactions and the reasons for the sales have not been publicly disclosed.
What happened in the Honasa block deal?
Honasa Consumer saw a significant change in its shareholder base on September 29, when Sequoia Capital and Peak XV Partners sold shares through open-market transactions.
Sequoia Capital Global Growth Fund III – U.S./India Annex Fund sold 25.02 lakh shares, representing approximately 0.76% of Honasa’s paid-up equity. The shares were sold at ₹450 each, generating proceeds of approximately ₹112.6 crore.
Peak XV Partners Investments VI sold approximately 1.07 crore shares, equivalent to around 3.3% of Honasa’s equity. At an average transaction price of ₹450.22 per share, the sale was worth approximately ₹484.23 crore.
Combined, the two investors sold more than 1.32 crore shares and reduced their holdings by a little more than 4 percentage points.
The transactions were particularly significant because both investors were among Honasa’s largest institutional shareholders.
Sequoia’s holding falls below 3%
Sequoia’s stake in Honasa has now fallen to 2.68%.
At the end of June 2026, Sequoia Capital Global Growth Fund III held approximately 3.44% of Honasa. Its sale of 0.76% of the company therefore brought the holding below the 3% level.
The change is important from a shareholder-structure perspective because Sequoia has been an early and prominent institutional backer associated with Honasa.
However, a reduction in ownership should not automatically be interpreted as a negative view of the company.
Venture capital and private-equity investors frequently sell portions of their holdings after a company lists on the stock market. Such transactions can be related to fund-return requirements, portfolio rebalancing, liquidity, investment-horizon considerations or other factors.
There is no public evidence in the disclosed transaction that Sequoia has said it is exiting Honasa because of concerns about the company’s business.
Peak XV remains a major shareholder
Peak XV’s transaction was considerably larger.
The investor sold approximately 1.07 crore shares, representing about 3.3% of Honasa. Before the transaction, Peak XV held around 14.8% of the company based on the June 2026 shareholding position.
After selling the 3.3% stake, its holding would be approximately 11.5%, assuming no other changes to its position.
That still makes Peak XV one of Honasa’s most significant shareholders.
This distinction matters because the transaction is better described as a partial exit or stake reduction rather than a complete withdrawal.
Peak XV continues to have a substantial economic interest in Honasa’s future performance.
The deal came after reports of a larger block sale
The September 29 transactions followed media reports that Peak XV, Sequoia Capital and Redwood Trust were looking to sell shares in Honasa through a block deal.
Earlier reports indicated a potential sale of up to 89 lakh shares, representing around 2.73% of Honasa, with a transaction value of up to ₹400 crore and a floor price of ₹450 per share.
The eventual disclosed transactions were larger.
Sequoia and Peak XV together sold more than 4% of Honasa, with their combined transactions valued at nearly ₹597 crore.
The difference between the earlier reported proposed transaction and the final disclosed trades is another reason to distinguish between preliminary block-deal reports and completed transactions.
The final transaction data provides the stronger basis for reporting the actual change in ownership.
Honasa shares fell after the stake sale
Honasa shares reacted negatively to the large transactions.
The stock fell 5.24% on September 29 and closed at ₹441.65. Trading volumes were significantly elevated as the large institutional transactions took place.
A large block sale can put short-term pressure on a stock because substantial supply becomes available in the market.
But the share-price reaction does not necessarily indicate a deterioration in the company’s underlying business.
In Honasa’s case, the selling occurred after a period of strong stock-market performance.
The company had reported a substantial improvement in financial performance in the June quarter, while its shares had also delivered significant gains during 2026.
Honasa’s business performance has improved
The stake sales come against the backdrop of stronger operating performance at Honasa.
For the first quarter of FY27, Honasa reported revenue from operations of approximately ₹755.9 crore, up 27% from ₹595.3 crore in the same quarter a year earlier.
Net profit rose to approximately ₹90.4 crore from ₹41.3 crore, representing growth of more than 100% year over year.
EBITDA also more than doubled to around ₹110 crore.
The results represented a significant improvement from the profitability concerns that had surrounded the company’s post-IPO performance.
Honasa management has attributed the improvement to stronger execution across its focus categories, product performance, offline distribution, content-led growth and newer brands.
The company operates a portfolio of beauty and personal-care brands, with Mamaearth being its best-known consumer brand. Its portfolio also includes The Derma Co and other brands across different categories.
Why the stake sale matters
The transaction is important for three reasons.
First, it changes the institutional ownership profile of Honasa.
Sequoia’s holding is now below 3%, while Peak XV remains a large shareholder despite reducing its stake.
Second, the transaction demonstrates the continued ability of large early investors to monetize holdings after Honasa’s public-market listing.
For public investors, such transactions can increase the free float and potentially improve liquidity over time.
Third, the timing highlights the difference between investor ownership and operating performance.
Honasa’s business metrics have improved significantly, but some early investors are simultaneously choosing to reduce their exposure.
These two developments are not necessarily contradictory.
From startup investment to public-market ownership
Honasa’s shareholder structure reflects the transition that occurs when a venture-backed consumer company becomes publicly traded.
Early investors typically provide capital during periods when the business is still developing its brands, distribution network and product portfolio.
After an IPO, those investors gain a liquid market through which they can gradually monetize their investments.
The resulting shareholder changes can therefore continue for years after listing.
For Honasa, the process is particularly relevant because the company raised substantial private capital before becoming a listed consumer company.
Peak XV, Sequoia and other institutional investors participated during Honasa’s earlier growth phase, when the business was being built around digitally native beauty and personal-care brands.
Their continued holdings mean that they remain economically exposed to the company’s future performance even after partial stake sales.
Other investors are also active in Honasa
The September transaction was not simply a case of institutional investors selling into an empty market.
Other large investors bought shares.
ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company acquired approximately 17.77 lakh Honasa shares for around ₹80 crore. Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund acquired about 33.33 lakh shares for approximately ₹150 crore.
These purchases indicate that the block transactions also involved a transfer of ownership between institutional investors.
This is important because a large shareholder sale does not necessarily mean that institutional interest in the company is disappearing.
Instead, ownership can move from one group of institutional investors to another.
Honasa’s shareholder structure is changing
Honasa’s shareholder structure has evolved substantially since the company went public.
Historical filings show Peak XV and Sequoia among the company’s significant public shareholders. The June 2026 ownership position showed Peak XV with approximately 14.8% and Sequoia with approximately 3.44%.
The latest transaction therefore represents a meaningful reduction for both investors.
Honasa ownership change
| Investor | Holding before sale | Stake sold | Approx. holding after sale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoia Capital | 3.44% | 0.76% | 2.68% |
| Peak XV Partners | 14.8% | 3.3% | ~11.5% |
Approximate figures based on June 2026 holdings and September 29 disclosed transactions.
The table illustrates the most important point: neither investor completely exited Honasa.
What it means for Mamaearth
For Mamaearth, the transaction matters indirectly.
Honasa is the parent company rather than Mamaearth being a separately listed business. Therefore, changes in Honasa’s institutional shareholder base affect the ownership structure of the overall beauty and personal-care platform.
Mamaearth remains the flagship consumer brand, but Honasa’s longer-term strategy has increasingly involved building a broader house of brands rather than depending on one name.
That makes the company’s ability to grow multiple brands particularly important for future valuation.
The recent financial results suggest that this strategy has begun producing stronger financial results, although sustained growth and profitability will remain important for investors.
The bigger question is whether performance can stay strong
The most important issue for Honasa is no longer simply whether it can grow revenue.
The company needs to demonstrate that it can sustain growth while improving profitability and building durable brands.
The June quarter provided encouraging evidence on that front.
Revenue growth remained strong, profit increased sharply and EBITDA more than doubled.
But consumer businesses can face rapid changes in customer acquisition costs, competition, advertising efficiency, offline distribution and product demand.
Honasa therefore needs to maintain operating discipline as it expands.
The stake sale by Sequoia and Peak XV does not change those fundamental requirements.
Why investors should separate selling from business fundamentals
A common mistake when analysing large institutional stake sales is to treat every sale as a direct judgment on the underlying company.
That is not necessarily correct.
A venture investor can sell shares even while believing that a company has further growth potential.
The investor may have held the shares for many years, may need to return capital to its own investors or may simply want to diversify its portfolio.
Likewise, a buyer participating in the same transaction may have a different investment horizon or a different assessment of the company’s future.
In Honasa’s case, the presence of institutional buyers alongside the sellers reinforces this point.
The September 29 transactions were essentially a transfer of shares between market participants.
What to watch next
The next important data point will be Honasa’s subsequent quarterly performance.
Investors will be watching whether the company’s revenue growth remains above 20%, whether EBITDA margins remain elevated and whether profitability continues to improve.
The company will also need to show that its newer brands can scale without weakening the economics of the overall business.
The shareholder side will also remain relevant.
If Sequoia continues selling, its stake could decline further. Peak XV could likewise reduce its holding over time, although there is currently no disclosed indication that either investor intends to completely exit.
Future disclosures will therefore provide a clearer picture of whether the September transaction was a one-off monetization event or part of a longer-term reduction in exposure.
FAQs
What is Sequoia’s current stake in Honasa Consumer?
Following the September 29, 2026 transaction, Sequoia Capital Global Growth Fund III’s stake in Honasa Consumer fell to approximately 2.68%, from about 3.44% at the end of June 2026.
How much Honasa stock did Peak XV sell?
Peak XV Partners Investments VI sold approximately 1.07 crore shares, representing about 3.3% of Honasa’s equity, for approximately ₹484.2 crore.
Is Peak XV exiting Honasa?
No. Based on the disclosed transaction, Peak XV reduced its holding from about 14.8% to approximately 11.5%. It therefore remains a substantial shareholder.
Why are Sequoia and Peak XV selling Honasa shares?
The disclosed transaction data does not provide a specific reason for the sales. Investors should not assume that the transactions represent a negative assessment of Honasa’s business without additional evidence.
The Bigger Picture
The Honasa transaction illustrates a normal but important phase in the lifecycle of venture-backed consumer companies. Once a startup becomes publicly listed, early investors can gradually monetize their holdings while new institutional investors take their place.
For Honasa, the more important question is whether the company’s improving financial performance can continue as ownership evolves. Strong Q1 FY27 numbers provide a positive operating backdrop, but the business still needs to prove that growth, brand building and profitability can remain durable.
Looking Ahead
Sequoia’s reduction to 2.68% and Peak XV’s cut to roughly 11.5% are significant changes in Honasa’s ownership structure, but neither transaction represents a complete exit. The company’s operating performance and future institutional shareholding disclosures will provide a better indication of how the market is reassessing the Mamaearth parent.
For now, the key distinction is between investor monetization and business deterioration. The available evidence confirms substantial selling by two early investors, but it does not establish that the sales were driven by concerns about Honasa’s underlying business.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.



