Tesla and Samsung are opposing additional US tariffs on Vietnamese goods, warning that higher import duties could disrupt manufacturing supply chains and increase costs for American businesses. Their objections come as the Trump administration approaches a November 29, 2026 deadline to conclude an investigation into Vietnam’s alleged intellectual property violations. The investigation could lead to additional trade restrictions against the Southeast Asian country.
The two companies have joined several US retailers and trade associations in urging Washington to avoid imposing further tariffs. However, American industry groups representing steel, seafood, solar panels, plywood and wood products are calling for stronger trade action against Vietnam. The disagreement highlights the competing interests of US manufacturers that depend on Vietnamese production and domestic industries seeking protection from foreign competition.
Why Tesla and Samsung Oppose Additional US Tariffs
Tesla and Samsung have warned that additional tariffs could make it more expensive for American businesses to source products and components from Vietnam.
Tesla submitted its comments to the US Trade Representative (USTR) on July 2, asking the administration to consider the supply-chain requirements of American manufacturers before imposing additional duties.
The electric vehicle company argued that certain advanced components and precision manufacturing equipment cannot be sourced domestically, despite significant investments in US production capacity.
This creates a challenge for American manufacturers. Although companies are investing in domestic factories, they continue to depend on international suppliers for specialised equipment and components.
Additional tariffs on Vietnamese imports could increase procurement costs and make manufacturing operations more expensive.
Samsung’s US subsidiary raised similar concerns, highlighting Vietnam’s importance to its electronics supply chain.
Vietnam Is a Major Manufacturing Base for Samsung
Vietnam plays a particularly important role in Samsung’s global manufacturing operations.
The country produces a significant share of Samsung’s smartphones and network equipment destined for the US market.
Samsung is also Vietnam’s largest foreign investor, with investments of approximately $25 billion.
The company’s manufacturing presence includes electronics production and expanding semiconductor-related operations. Samsung’s investments have helped establish Vietnam as an important part of its global production network.
For Samsung, additional US tariffs could create a complicated situation: products manufactured in Vietnam for American customers could become more expensive to import into the United States.
The company has therefore urged Washington to consider the consequences of additional trade restrictions on businesses that depend on Vietnamese manufacturing.
US Trade Investigation Could Lead to New Tariffs
The dispute centres on an investigation launched by the USTR in May 2026 under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974.
The investigation examines whether Vietnam’s policies and practices concerning intellectual property protection and enforcement are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict US commerce.
In April 2026, Washington designated Vietnam a priority foreign country in its intellectual property review. This is the most serious category under the US system for identifying countries with significant intellectual property protection and enforcement concerns.
The designation was particularly notable because Vietnam became the first jurisdiction in 13 years to receive it.
The Trump administration has set November 29, 2026, as the deadline to conclude the investigation.
However, the final scope of any potential trade action remains uncertain. Additional tariffs could apply broadly to Vietnamese imports or target particular industries and products.
Vietnam has urged Washington to conduct its investigations objectively.
US Businesses Are Divided Over Vietnam Tariffs
Tesla and Samsung are not the only companies opposing additional tariffs.
Retail groups and trade associations representing businesses with manufacturing operations in Vietnam have also urged the US government to avoid imposing further duties.
These include companies and industry groups connected to:
- Footwear and apparel manufacturing.
- Bicycle production.
- Video game consoles and consumer electronics.
- Other consumer goods manufactured in Vietnam.
Their argument is that additional tariffs could increase costs for American importers, retailers and consumers.
However, several US industrial groups are taking the opposite position.
Organisations representing American producers of steel, seafood, plywood, solar panels and wood products have accused Vietnam of unfair trade practices and called for stronger penalties.
The disagreement demonstrates how trade policy can create competing interests within the same economy. Importers want access to affordable overseas production, while domestic manufacturers may seek tariffs to protect their industries.
Software and Entertainment Groups Raise Piracy Concerns
The tariff investigation has also attracted attention from organisations representing software developers, film studios and music companies.
These groups are asking Washington to secure stronger commitments from Vietnam to address intellectual property violations and online piracy.
The Business Software Alliance, whose members include Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, has criticised Vietnam’s enforcement record.
The organisation cited a 2017 survey suggesting that approximately three-quarters of software installed on personal computers in Vietnam was unlicensed.
The Motion Picture Association has separately described Vietnam as a major centre for online piracy.
It said websites distributing unauthorised films and television programmes attracted more than 12.5 billion visits worldwide last year.
The association has called for stronger enforcement against piracy and improved market access for legitimate streaming services.
These are allegations and assessments submitted by industry organisations as part of the trade debate, rather than findings that establish wrongdoing by every Vietnamese business.
US Tariffs on Vietnamese Goods Already Stand at 12.5%
The potential new duties would come on top of an existing general US tariff on Vietnamese goods.
Vietnamese imports currently face a 12.5% general tariff introduced in July 2026 following a separate investigation concerning alleged failures to prevent imports of goods made using forced labour.
The country had previously faced a 20% tariff under President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariff programme. Those duties were subsequently struck down by the US Supreme Court.
The distinction between the existing tariff and the latest investigation is important. The 12.5% rate is already in effect, while additional tariffs linked to intellectual property concerns remain under consideration.
| Trade development | Status |
|---|---|
| General US tariff on Vietnamese goods | 12.5% |
| Earlier reciprocal tariff | 20%, subsequently struck down |
| Intellectual property investigation | Underway |
| Investigation launched | May 2026 |
| Deadline to conclude investigation | November 29, 2026 |
| Potential additional tariffs | Not yet confirmed |
The outcome could affect businesses importing electronics, machinery, consumer goods and other products manufactured in Vietnam.
Vietnam’s Exports to the US Continue to Increase
The tariff dispute is unfolding as Vietnam’s trade relationship with the United States expands.
Vietnamese exports to the US increased 42% during the first eight months of 2026 compared with the same period in 2025.
This growth made Vietnam the US trading partner with the largest goods-trade surplus, ahead of China and Mexico.
The development is significant because Vietnam has become an increasingly important manufacturing alternative for international businesses seeking to diversify production away from China.
Its role in electronics, footwear, apparel and consumer goods supply chains has expanded over recent years.
However, the growing trade surplus has also increased scrutiny from Washington, particularly among American industries concerned about competition and trade practices.
The Bigger Picture
The disagreement involving Tesla, Samsung and US industry groups highlights the complexity of modern global supply chains. American companies may support domestic manufacturing expansion while still depending on imported components, machinery and finished products from countries such as Vietnam.
Additional tariffs could protect certain domestic industries but also increase costs for companies that rely on Vietnamese production. The final decision will therefore involve balancing intellectual property enforcement, domestic manufacturing interests and the economic consequences of disrupting established supply chains.
For Vietnam, the investigation represents another challenge to its position as a major manufacturing and export hub. Its ability to address US concerns while maintaining access to the American market will be important for future trade relations.
Looking Ahead
The November 29 deadline will be the next major milestone in the dispute. Businesses will be watching for the USTR’s findings and whether Washington proposes broad tariffs, sector-specific restrictions or other measures targeting Vietnam’s intellectual property practices. No additional tariff rate or product coverage has been confirmed so far.
For Tesla and Samsung, the priority is maintaining access to Vietnamese manufacturing networks without facing additional import costs. For American industrial groups, the investigation provides an opportunity to push for stronger trade protections. The final outcome could influence manufacturing decisions, sourcing strategies and the cost of imported goods across several industries.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
