Quick-commerce company Zepto’s decision to defer its proposed initial public offering has raised questions about whether the company was ready to enter the public markets at its current stage of growth. Market veteran and Zepto investor Raamdeo Agrawal has described the IPO plan as premature, arguing that companies should ideally approach public investors only when they are profitable or have a visible path to profitability.
The comments come after Zepto deferred its proposed IPO amid discussions over valuation. The company was reportedly considering a valuation of around $2.5 billion to $3 billion, significantly below the $7 billion valuation at which it raised $450 million in October 2025. Zepto has instead agreed with major shareholders to close a pre-IPO equity funding round before returning to the public-market process
Raamdeo Agrawal Says Zepto Moved Too Early
Agrawal, chairman of Motilal Oswal Financial Services and a personal investor in Zepto, said the company’s IPO attempt highlights the difficulty growth-stage businesses can face when they approach public investors before reaching profitability.
He argued that public markets place a much greater emphasis on earnings than private investors.
According to Agrawal, a company can grow rapidly while deliberately accepting losses because it is spending heavily on customer acquisition and expansion. Private investors may be willing to look beyond those losses if they believe the business can eventually generate strong returns.
Public-market investors, however, have to evaluate the company through quarterly financial results.
Private Market vs Public Market
| Factor | Private Investors | Public-Market Investors |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Long-term growth potential | Earnings and valuation |
| Investment horizon | Often several years | Continuous market pricing |
| Loss tolerance | Can be relatively higher | Generally more scrutinized |
| Valuation pressure | Negotiated privately | Determined by market demand |
| Financial reporting | Periodic | Quarterly and highly visible |
| Mark-to-market | Not daily | Continuous share-price movement |
Agrawal said this difference can make it difficult for a loss-making company to communicate its underlying value to public investors. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Zepto’s Valuation Gap Has Become a Major Issue
The most visible problem surrounding Zepto’s IPO is the gap between its private-market valuation and what institutional investors appear willing to pay in the public offering.
Zepto was valued at $7 billion when it raised $450 million in October 2025 in a funding round led by US-based pension fund Calpers.
The valuation reportedly being discussed for the IPO, however, is around $2.5 billion to $3 billion.
That would represent a substantial reduction from the company’s last private valuation.
Zepto’s Valuation Journey
October 2025
↓
$7 billion private valuation
↓
Proposed IPO
↓
Institutional investor concerns
↓
$2.5–3 billion valuation under discussion
↓
IPO deferred
↓
Pre-IPO funding round planned
The gap illustrates the challenge faced by high-growth startups when private-market expectations collide with public-market valuation discipline.
Why Public Investors Are More Focused on Profitability
Public investors typically have access to a company’s quarterly financial statements and can compare its performance with listed peers.
That creates a different standard for companies that are still prioritizing growth over profits.
Agrawal said companies should ideally enter the public markets when they are already profitable or are close to profitability within a clearly visible timeframe.
His argument is that investors need a credible way to estimate the company’s future earnings before assigning a valuation.
For a company that is still generating large losses, that exercise becomes considerably more difficult.
Zepto’s Growth Comes With Heavy Costs
Quick commerce is one of India’s fastest-growing consumer internet categories.
Companies such as Zepto, Blinkit and Swiggy Instamart have invested heavily in building networks of dark stores, expanding delivery capacity and attracting customers.
The model depends on high order volumes and increasingly dense delivery networks.
However, building this infrastructure requires substantial spending.
Quick-Commerce Growth Model
More dark stores
↓
Wider product availability
↓
Faster deliveries
↓
More customers
↓
Higher order volumes
↓
Greater revenue
But also:
↓
Higher infrastructure costs
+
Employee and delivery costs
+
Customer acquisition spending
+
Promotional expenses
↓
Pressure on profitability
The central investment question is whether the additional scale eventually produces sufficient operating leverage to offset these costs.
Public Markets May Demand a Clearer Path to Profit
Private investors can sometimes fund a company for years while it focuses on market share.
Public shareholders generally expect greater visibility into when that investment will translate into earnings.
This difference is particularly important for quick-commerce businesses.
The sector is still expanding rapidly, but companies are simultaneously competing on delivery speed, product selection, pricing, promotions and geographic coverage.
That competition can make it difficult to reduce spending without slowing growth.
Zepto Has Deferred Its IPO
Earlier this month, Zepto deferred its proposed listing after agreeing with major shareholders to complete a pre-IPO equity funding round.
The decision followed discussions over the valuation at which the company could realistically access public markets.
The delay does not necessarily mean that Zepto has abandoned its IPO plans.
Instead, the company appears to be using additional private capital to strengthen its position before attempting the public offering again. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Zepto’s Proposed IPO Is Large
Zepto’s proposed IPO is significant in scale.
According to its updated prospectus, the company plans a fresh issue of shares worth ₹8,010 crore.
Existing shareholders are also expected to sell nearly 11.35 crore shares through an offer for sale.
| IPO Component | Proposed Size |
|---|---|
| Fresh issue | ₹8,010 crore |
| Offer for sale | Nearly 11.35 crore shares |
| IPO status | Deferred |
| Pre-IPO round | Being pursued |
| Previous private valuation | $7 billion |
| Valuation under discussion | $2.5–3 billion |
The size of the planned offering makes valuation particularly important because even a relatively small change in the valuation multiple can significantly affect the amount investors are willing to commit.
Zepto Had Already Received Regulatory Approval
Zepto confidentially filed its IPO papers with the Securities and Exchange Board of India in December 2025.
The company received regulatory approval in May 2026.
This means the IPO process had progressed significantly before the valuation issue emerged.
The current delay therefore reflects market and investor considerations rather than an inability to move forward with regulatory preparations. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
Why the Valuation Matters So Much
A company’s private valuation is determined through negotiated funding rounds.
The public market operates differently.
Institutional investors participating in an IPO need to assess the company against listed businesses and determine whether the expected future earnings justify the price.
If a startup enters the IPO market at a valuation substantially higher than what public investors consider reasonable, demand can weaken.
This can force the company to either reduce its valuation or delay the offering.
Zepto’s $7 Billion Valuation Faces a Reality Check
The difference between the $7 billion private valuation and the $2.5–3 billion valuation reportedly being discussed represents a potential valuation reduction of more than 50%.
That is significant for both the company and existing investors.
For Zepto, a lower valuation could mean raising less capital than expected through the IPO.
For existing investors, it could imply that their holdings are worth considerably less than they were at the last funding round.
This is one reason why the company is seeking additional private funding before proceeding.
Mark-to-Market Pressure Matters
Agrawal also highlighted another difference between private and public markets.
Mutual funds and other institutional investors must regularly mark their holdings to market.
If a newly listed company falls sharply after its IPO, investors can immediately see a loss in the value of their portfolios.
That creates greater sensitivity around the price at which an IPO is launched.
Private investors, by contrast, do not face the same daily public-market pricing pressure.
Rapid Growth Alone May Not Be Enough
One of the biggest lessons from the Zepto situation is that high revenue growth does not automatically guarantee a strong IPO.
A startup can grow at 50%, 100% or more while still losing money.
If those losses are necessary to acquire customers and establish infrastructure, private investors may accept them.
Public investors will increasingly ask whether the company can reduce those losses as it scales.
The quality of growth therefore becomes more important than growth alone.
Unit Economics Will Be Closely Watched
For Zepto, investors are likely to focus heavily on unit economics.
Important indicators include:
- Average order value
- Gross merchandise value
- Contribution margin
- Customer acquisition cost
- Repeat purchase rate
- Delivery cost
- Dark-store productivity
- Gross margin
- Cash burn
- Store-level profitability
Improving these metrics would make it easier for Zepto to demonstrate that its growth can eventually translate into sustainable earnings.
Dark Stores Are Central to the Business
Quick-commerce companies depend on a dense network of small fulfilment centres, commonly called dark stores.
These facilities allow orders to be picked and dispatched rapidly.
However, dark stores also create fixed operating costs.
A store needs sufficient order density to generate attractive economics.
Dark-Store Economics
Dark store opened
↓
Rent + staff + inventory
↓
Orders increase
↓
Fixed costs spread across more orders
↓
Higher store productivity
↓
Improved contribution margin
This is why order density is so important for quick-commerce companies.
Competition Makes Profitability More Difficult
Zepto operates in a highly competitive market.
Blinkit and Swiggy Instamart are major rivals, while other companies and large retailers are also increasing their presence in fast grocery delivery.
Competition can force companies to maintain spending on discounts, customer acquisition and expansion.
As long as competitors continue investing aggressively, reducing expenses can become difficult.
Quick Commerce Is Still Expanding Rapidly
Despite the profitability debate, consumer adoption of quick commerce continues to increase.
Customers are using the services not only for emergency grocery purchases but also for routine household products, personal-care items, electronics and other categories.
The expansion of product categories could increase order frequency and average basket sizes.
That provides a potential route toward better economics over time.
Higher Order Volumes Could Improve Economics
The fundamental argument behind quick-commerce profitability is operating leverage.
Once a dark store reaches sufficient order density, additional orders can potentially be fulfilled without proportionately increasing all costs.
Similarly, delivery routes can become more efficient when order volumes are high.
This could allow contribution margins to improve as the network matures.
The challenge is reaching that scale while maintaining enough cash to fund expansion.
Pre-IPO Funding Gives Zepto More Time
The planned pre-IPO equity round could provide Zepto with additional financial flexibility.
Instead of accepting a significantly lower public-market valuation immediately, the company can raise private capital and continue improving its operating metrics.
This could potentially give management more time to demonstrate stronger unit economics.
However, another private round also means existing investors may need to accept new valuation terms.
Agrawal Remains Positive About the Long Term
Despite describing the IPO attempt as premature, Agrawal did not characterize his investment in Zepto as a failure.
He said the success or failure of his investment should be judged over a much longer period rather than based on the current IPO setback.
His comments underline the difference between evaluating a private startup investment and judging a public-market listing.
The IPO delay may therefore represent a timing issue rather than a verdict on Zepto’s long-term business model.
What the Delay Means for Zepto
For Zepto, the IPO delay provides an opportunity to focus on operational improvement.
The company can potentially use the additional time to:
- Improve margins
- Increase order density
- Improve dark-store economics
- Reduce cash burn
- Expand profitable categories
- Strengthen customer retention
- Build a clearer path to profitability
If these improvements are visible, the company may eventually return to the IPO market with stronger fundamentals.
What It Means for India’s Startup IPO Market
Zepto’s experience could influence other Indian startups preparing to go public.
The lesson for founders is that private-market valuations cannot always be transferred directly to public markets.
Public investors may demand stronger evidence of profitability, cash generation and sustainable unit economics.
This could encourage startups to delay IPOs until their financial performance is more mature.
Public Investors Are Becoming More Selective
India’s new-age companies have attracted considerable investor interest over the past few years.
However, public investors have also become more selective about companies with large losses and aggressive valuations.
The Zepto situation demonstrates that a strong brand and rapid growth may not be sufficient when the valuation is difficult to justify against future earnings.
What Investors Will Watch Next
The next important developments around Zepto are likely to include:
- Size and valuation of the pre-IPO funding round
- New private-market valuation
- Quarterly revenue growth
- Cash burn
- Contribution margins
- Dark-store profitability
- Competitive intensity
- Revised IPO valuation
- Timing of the public offering
The company’s ability to improve its financial profile will determine how attractive the IPO becomes.
Key Facts at a Glance
| Metric | Details |
|---|---|
| Company | Zepto |
| Sector | Quick commerce |
| Investor quoted | Raamdeo Agrawal |
| Previous private valuation | $7 billion |
| Valuation under discussion | $2.5–3 billion |
| October 2025 funding | $450 million |
| Fresh IPO issue | ₹8,010 crore |
| OFS | Nearly 11.35 crore shares |
| IPO status | Deferred |
| Pre-IPO funding | Being pursued |
| Confidential IPO filing | December 2025 |
| SEBI approval | May 2026 |
| Core challenge | Valuation and profitability |
| Key investor concern | Path to sustainable earnings |
Infographic: Why Zepto’s IPO Was Delayed
ZEPTO
↓
RAPID QUICK-COMMERCE GROWTH
↓
HEAVY INVESTMENT
Dark stores
+
Delivery
+
Customer acquisition
+
Expansion
↓
STRONG REVENUE GROWTH
BUT
↓
PROFITABILITY REMAINS A KEY CONCERN
↓
IPO VALUATION DISCUSSIONS
$2.5–3 BILLION
↓
VS
↓
$7 BILLION
LAST PRIVATE VALUATION
↓
VALUATION GAP
↓
IPO DEFERRED
↓
PRE-IPO FUNDING ROUND
↓
FOCUS ON
UNIT ECONOMICS
+
MARGINS
+
CASH BURN
+
PROFITABILITY
↓
POTENTIAL IPO AT A LATER STAGE
The Bigger Picture
Zepto’s decision to defer its IPO highlights the growing gap between how high-growth startups are valued in private markets and how public investors assess them. The company was last valued at $7 billion in a $450 million funding round in October 2025, while the valuation reportedly being discussed for the IPO is around $2.5 billion to $3 billion. Market veteran and Zepto investor Raamdeo Agrawal believes the company may have approached the public market too early because public investors place much greater emphasis on earnings and a visible path to profitability. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
The episode also offers a broader lesson for India’s startup ecosystem. Rapid growth can justify significant private-market investment when investors have a long-term horizon, but public markets require companies to demonstrate that growth can eventually produce sustainable earnings. Zepto’s ₹8,010 crore fresh issue and proposed offer for sale make the valuation question especially important. The company now has an opportunity to improve its unit economics, reduce cash burn and strengthen profitability before attempting to return to the public markets. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
Looking Ahead
Zepto’s immediate priority is likely to complete its pre-IPO funding round and use the additional time to strengthen its financial and operating metrics. Improvements in dark-store productivity, contribution margins, customer retention and cash generation could help narrow the gap between private-market expectations and public-market valuations. The eventual IPO timing will depend on market conditions as well as the company’s ability to demonstrate a clearer path toward profitability.
For India’s broader startup ecosystem, Zepto’s experience could encourage more companies to approach IPOs with greater financial maturity. As public investors become more demanding, startups may increasingly prioritize sustainable unit economics and predictable earnings before seeking a listing. If Zepto can convert its scale and rapid customer adoption into stronger profitability, the current IPO delay could ultimately prove to be a strategic pause rather than a setback.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
