The Indian government has defended its valuation and bidding process for the proposed sale of a 60.72% stake in IDBI Bank, saying a revised bidding procedure increased the transaction value by ₹3,917 crore. The Finance Ministry said the process was authorised by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) and conducted under the supervision of the Core Group of Secretaries on Disinvestment (CGD).
The clarification comes amid questions about the decision to conduct a second round of bidding and the valuation benchmark used for the transaction. The government has approved the sale of its and Life Insurance Corporation of India’s (LIC) combined 60.72% stake to Canada’s Fairfax Financial Holdings for approximately ₹52,878 crore, at ₹81 per share. The ministry maintains that the reserve price was not changed between bidding rounds and that two independent advisers conducted separate valuations.
Key Takeaways
- The government says the revised bidding process increased IDBI Bank’s transaction value by ₹3,917 crore.
- Fairfax Financial Holdings is set to acquire a combined 60.72% stake in IDBI Bank for approximately ₹52,878 crore.
- The approved acquisition price is ₹81 per share.
- Two independent advisers conducted valuations using separate methodologies.
- The government says the reserve price was neither increased nor decreased during the process.
- A potential tax-related liability of ₹627 crore was addressed through an indemnity arrangement.
- The proposed transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals, including clearance from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
Why Is the Government Defending IDBI Bank’s Valuation?
The Finance Ministry issued its clarification on October 29 after questions emerged about the bidding procedure and valuation methodology used in the IDBI Bank stake sale.
The central issue concerns the decision to conduct a second or “best-offer” round after the initial bidding process did not produce an acceptable offer.
According to the ministry, the first round took place during the financial year 2025-26 under the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management’s (DIPAM) internal guidelines.
The ministry described these guidelines as indicative practices rather than rigid legal rules. It argued that complex strategic disinvestment transactions require flexibility to address procedural issues and avoid unnecessary delays.
The CCEA had delegated powers to the CGD to make decisions on procedural matters and consider deviations where necessary for the effective execution of strategic disinvestment transactions.
The government said the CGD used these powers to determine the procedure for the second bidding round.
It also maintained that the original reserve price was not changed. Instead, the first round was treated as concluded after the initial bids were not approved, allowing a fresh best-offer process to take place.
How Did the Revised Process Add ₹3,917 Crore?
One of the most important points in the Finance Ministry’s clarification concerns the difference between the potential tax liability and the additional value generated through the revised transaction process.
The government said the valuation exercise included provisions for disputed tax demands through an indemnity arrangement requested by qualified bidders.
An indemnity is a contractual arrangement under which one party agrees to compensate another for specified losses or liabilities under agreed conditions.
According to the ministry, the potential liability covered by this arrangement was approximately ₹627 crore.
However, the final bid-discovered price increased the transaction value by ₹3,917 crore.
The ministry argued that the additional value generated for the government and LIC was substantially higher than the potential liability.
| Particulars | Amount |
|---|---|
| Additional transaction value | ₹3,917 crore |
| Potential tax-related liability | ₹627 crore |
| Difference | ₹3,290 crore |
| Approved bid price | ₹81 per share |
| Total transaction value | Approximately ₹52,878 crore |
The government said reimbursement would apply only if the relevant additional tax demand was actually paid. It described the possibility of this liability arising as low.
The ministry presented the arrangement as a way to address bidders’ concerns without materially reducing the value of the transaction.
How Was IDBI Bank’s Valuation Calculated?
The government said two independent advisers were involved in the valuation process, using separate methodologies.
The valuation exercise was reviewed by the CGD in April 2026, before the best-offer bidding round.
The independent agencies began updated assessments in May after IDBI Bank’s financial accounts for the year ended March 31, 2026, became publicly available.
The ministry said the process was conducted on a double-blind basis.
Under this arrangement, bidders did not know the valuation prepared by the advisers, while the valuation agencies did not have access to the confidential financial bids.
Only the CGD had access to both sets of information and could compare the offers with the independent valuations.
The transaction adviser used the Market Multiple Method, while the comparable-company assessment relied on listed public sector banks because suitable comparable transactions were unavailable.
The government said these measures were intended to provide a contemporaneous assessment of the bank’s value rather than relying on potentially distorted market prices.
Why Was IDBI Bank’s Market Price Not Used as the Main Benchmark?
The valuation dispute also involves the treatment of IDBI Bank’s stock market price.
The Finance Ministry said the bank’s shares were relatively narrowly traded and experienced volatility, making the market price unsuitable as the sole benchmark for determining its strategic sale value.
Instead, the valuation agencies used financial information and comparable-company methodologies to estimate the bank’s fair value.
The ministry also highlighted that IDBI Bank’s ownership structure had changed over time.
LIC acquired a majority stake in the bank in 2019. As a result, the Reserve Bank of India began treating IDBI Bank as a private-sector bank for certain regulatory purposes, although the government and LIC continued to hold the overwhelming majority of its shares.
The government argued that this distinction needed to be considered when evaluating the bank and selecting comparable institutions.
Fairfax Financial to Acquire 60.72% Stake in IDBI Bank
On October 14, 2026, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs approved the sale of a combined 60.72% stake in IDBI Bank to a subsidiary of Fairfax Financial Holdings.
The transaction involves shares held by both the central government and LIC.
| Shareholder | Stake being sold | Approximate transaction value |
|---|---|---|
| Government of India | 30.48% | ₹26,620 crore |
| LIC | 30.24% | ₹26,440 crore |
| Total | 60.72% | ₹52,878 crore |
Fairfax will acquire the shares at ₹81 each, above the benchmark fair value of ₹75.99 per share determined by the independent valuation agencies.
After the transaction, the government is expected to retain approximately 15% of IDBI Bank, while LIC will retain around 19%.
This means the government and LIC will continue to hold a combined minority stake in the bank.
The proposed sale represents a major step in India’s banking privatisation programme and would give Fairfax a controlling interest in IDBI Bank.
Political Debate Over the IDBI Bank Sale
The valuation clarification has also become part of a wider political debate about the government’s decision to sell its stake in the bank.
Congress leader and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi criticised the proposed transaction and questioned the decision to sell a bank that had returned to profitability.
Gandhi also raised concerns about the interests of employees and the future of IDBI Bank as a financial institution with a public-sector history.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman defended the transaction on October 30, saying that due process had been followed. She argued that the bank had required substantial recapitalisation and governance improvements.
Sitharaman said the government had recapitalised IDBI Bank by more than ₹25,000 crore and maintained that the institution was now positioned for its next phase of growth.
The two sides therefore differ over the broader question of whether the stake sale represents an appropriate restructuring of the bank or the transfer of an important public financial institution to private ownership.
What Happens Next in the IDBI Bank Stake Sale?
The proposed transaction still requires the necessary regulatory approvals.
The RBI’s approval is particularly important because Fairfax is acquiring a controlling stake in a banking institution.
The government has indicated that the transaction is expected to be completed by the end of the current financial year, subject to the required clearances.
Once completed, Fairfax will become the strategic controlling shareholder, while the government and LIC will retain minority holdings.
The retained stakes also mean that the public-sector shareholders could benefit if the bank’s value increases following the restructuring.
The Bigger Picture
The IDBI Bank transaction highlights the complexity of selling a large financial institution in which the government and a public-sector insurer hold substantial stakes. Valuation depends not only on the bank’s reported financial performance but also on its ownership structure, liabilities, regulatory position and future business prospects.
The government’s ₹3,917 crore argument is central to its defence of the process. However, the debate also demonstrates why transparency around reserve prices, valuation methodologies and indemnity arrangements matters in large public-sector transactions. The final assessment of the deal will depend on the completed transaction, regulatory scrutiny and IDBI Bank’s performance under its new ownership structure.
Looking Ahead
The immediate focus will be on regulatory approvals and the completion of Fairfax’s proposed acquisition. Investors and bank employees will also watch how the new controlling shareholder approaches management, lending, technology investment and the bank’s wider business strategy.
For the government and LIC, the retained stakes create an opportunity to participate in any future increase in the bank’s value. Whether the transaction delivers the expected benefits will depend on IDBI Bank’s ability to sustain profitability, improve operations and compete effectively in India’s banking market.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why is the government defending IDBI Bank’s valuation?
The government is defending the valuation because questions were raised about the second bidding round, the reserve price and the methodology used to determine the bank’s value. The Finance Ministry says the process followed authorised procedures and increased the transaction value by ₹3,917 crore.
2. How much is Fairfax paying for IDBI Bank?
Fairfax Financial Holdings is set to pay approximately ₹52,878 crore for a combined 60.72% stake in IDBI Bank, at ₹81 per share.
3. What is the ₹3,917 crore increase mentioned by the government?
The Finance Ministry says the revised bidding process increased the transaction value by ₹3,917 crore compared with the earlier bid-discovered price.
4. Was the IDBI Bank reserve price changed?
The government says the reserve price was neither increased nor decreased. It maintains that the initial bidding round was concluded after the bids were not approved and a separate best-offer round was conducted.
5. How much of IDBI Bank will the government and LIC retain?
After the proposed transaction, the central government is expected to retain approximately 15%, while LIC will retain around 19%.
6. Is the IDBI Bank sale completed?
No. The government has approved the transaction, but completion remains subject to the required regulatory clearances, including RBI approval.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
