The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) is preparing to examine more than 650 responses received from insurers, insurance agents, brokers and other stakeholders on its proposed overhaul of insurance commissions. The feedback deadline closed on October 31, following a one-week extension granted by the regulator because of strong industry participation.
The consultation paper, released on September 23, proposes tighter commission limits, changes to insurers’ expense-of-management (EoM) rules and a new distribution framework. The proposed changes could significantly affect how insurance companies compensate agents, brokers, banks and other intermediaries. The industry is now waiting for revised draft guidelines and the final regulatory framework.
Why Is IRDAI Reviewing Insurance Commission Structures?
Insurance companies in India distribute policies through several channels, including individual agents, corporate agents, banks, insurance brokers and digital platforms.
These intermediaries receive commissions and other forms of remuneration for selling insurance products.
IRDAI believes that distribution costs need to be better aligned with the type of insurance product, the distribution channel and the actual effort involved in selling a policy.
The regulator’s September 23 consultation paper, titled Recalibrating Economics of Insurance Distribution, proposes changes intended to improve transparency, reduce excessive distribution expenses and strengthen policyholder interests.
One of the major concerns highlighted by the regulator is the growth in intermediary remuneration compared with new insurance premiums.
The consultation paper also seeks to address differences in commission structures across insurance products and distribution channels.
Rather than relying on a broad commission framework, IRDAI wants a more differentiated structure that considers the nature of each insurance product.
IRDAI Receives More Than 650 Responses From Insurance Industry
The regulator received more than 650 responses to its consultation paper before the feedback deadline.
The original deadline was October 25, 2026. However, IRDAI extended it to October 31 to allow more stakeholders to participate.
The submissions came from different parts of the insurance ecosystem, including:
- Life and general insurance companies.
- Individual insurance agents.
- Insurance brokers.
- Corporate agents.
- Banks and non-banking financial companies.
- Industry associations.
- Policyholders and other interested participants.
The regulator now needs to evaluate these responses and consider the financial and operational implications of the proposed changes.
The industry has expressed different concerns depending on its business model. Large insurers, smaller insurance companies, brokers and individual agents do not necessarily face the same challenges under the proposed framework.
IRDAI Chairman Ajay Seth has indicated that the regulator wants to implement the reforms without unnecessarily disrupting existing businesses or insurance distribution networks.
What Changes Has IRDAI Proposed for Insurance Commissions?
One of the most important proposals involves introducing product-specific and distribution-channel-specific commission limits.
Under the proposed framework, commission payments would depend on the insurance product, the distribution channel and the effort involved in selling the policy.
This could change how insurers compensate agents, banks and brokers.
Proposed Changes to Insurance Distribution
| Area | Proposed Change | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Commission limits | Product-specific and channel-specific caps | Changes intermediary remuneration |
| Expense of management | Gradual reduction in expense limits | Controls insurers’ distribution and operating costs |
| Individual distributors | Separate commission limits | Recognises individual sales effort |
| Corporate distributors | Separate remuneration framework | Changes economics for banks and corporate agents |
| Indirect incentives | Greater restrictions on additional payments | Improves transparency |
| Insurance bundling | Restrictions on compulsory bundling with loans | Strengthens customer choice |
The proposals are designed to make commission payments more transparent and reduce excessive distribution costs.
However, the final impact will depend on the limits and conditions adopted in the eventual regulations.
Credit Life Insurance Commission Could Fall From 40% to 2%
One of the most significant proposals concerns credit life insurance.
Credit life insurance provides financial protection against outstanding loan obligations in certain circumstances, such as the borrower’s death.
These policies are commonly distributed alongside loans through banks, non-banking financial companies and other lending institutions.
Under IRDAI’s consultation proposal, the commission limit for credit life insurance could be reduced to 2% from the existing 40% framework cited in the proposal.
Such a reduction would significantly change the economics of distributing these policies.
Banks and other corporate distributors that earn substantial income from selling credit-linked insurance could face lower remuneration.
The proposal also reflects the regulator’s concern about distribution costs and the relationship between insurance products and loan sales.
However, the proposed 2% limit is part of the consultation process and should not be treated as an already implemented rule.
IRDAI Plans to Reduce Expense-of-Management Limits Over Five Years
Another major component of the consultation paper involves changes to expense-of-management regulations.
Expense of management refers to the expenses incurred by insurance companies to operate their businesses, including distribution, administration and other operating costs.
IRDAI has proposed reducing the applicable expense limits gradually over a five-year period.
The objective is to encourage insurers to operate more efficiently and control the cost of acquiring and servicing customers.
A phased reduction could give insurance companies time to adjust their distribution agreements, operational structures and technology investments.
However, insurers have raised concerns about implementing the proposed reductions too quickly.
Some industry participants argue that compliance costs, technology investments and customer servicing requirements have increased, making an aggressive reduction in expense limits difficult.
The final framework will need to balance cost efficiency with the need to maintain accessible insurance distribution networks.
Why Insurance Brokers and Agents Are Concerned
The proposed reforms have generated concerns among insurance intermediaries because commissions are an important source of revenue for their businesses.
Insurance brokers, in particular, have warned that their revenue could decline by as much as 60% if the proposals are implemented in their current form.
Industry participants have also raised concerns about possible job losses, reduced incentives for agents and difficulties in selling lower-ticket insurance policies.
Some of the major concerns include:
1. Lower distributor income: Tighter commission limits could reduce earnings for brokers, agents and corporate distributors.
2. Employment concerns: Smaller distribution businesses may struggle to maintain their existing workforce if revenue declines substantially.
3. Smaller insurance markets: Lower commissions could make it less attractive for intermediaries to sell certain low-premium policies.
4. Higher compliance costs: Insurance distributors may need additional technology and administrative resources to meet regulatory requirements.
5. Business model changes: Banks, brokers and other corporate agents may need to revise their distribution agreements and revenue structures.
Several stakeholders have also sought a longer transition period to implement the changes.
The Confederation of General Insurance Agents Associations of India has sought at least three years, while the Insurance Brokers Association of India has proposed a phased transition aligned with the broader EoM reduction timeline.
IRDAI Also Wants to Address Mis-Selling and Insurance Bundling
The consultation paper is not limited to commission reductions.
It also seeks to address distribution practices that can negatively affect insurance customers.
One area of concern is compulsory insurance bundling with loans.
In some cases, borrowers may be encouraged or pressured to purchase insurance products while taking loans. IRDAI wants to strengthen customer choice and restrict practices that make insurance purchases effectively compulsory.
The regulator is also examining how mis-selling allegations should be handled.
Industry participants have sought a proper adjudication process before a distributor is formally held responsible for mis-selling.
This is important because insurance intermediaries argue that complaints and allegations should be evaluated through a transparent process.
The proposed changes could therefore affect not only distributor remuneration but also how insurance products are marketed and sold.
When Could the New Insurance Commission Rules Take Effect?
The insurance industry is now waiting for IRDAI to evaluate the feedback and move towards the next stage of the regulatory process.
IRDAI Chairman Ajay Seth has previously indicated that January 1 or April 1 could be possible implementation dates.
However, the final timeline has not been confirmed.
Many insurers and intermediaries are expecting the framework to take effect from April 2027, giving them more time to adjust their business models.
| Regulatory Development | Date |
|---|---|
| IRDAI consultation paper released | September 23, 2026 |
| Original feedback deadline | October 25, 2026 |
| Revised feedback deadline | October 31, 2026 |
| Stakeholder responses received | More than 650 |
| Proposed implementation window | January or April 2027 |
| Final regulatory framework | Awaited |
The regulator’s next steps will involve examining stakeholder feedback and determining whether changes are required to the original proposals.
The final implementation date will depend on the regulatory process and the framework ultimately approved by IRDAI.
What Could the Commission Reforms Mean for Insurance Customers?
The proposed reforms could influence how insurance products are distributed and priced in India.
Lower distribution expenses may help insurers improve operating efficiency and retain more premium income.
However, lower commissions do not automatically mean lower insurance premiums for customers.
The actual benefit will depend on how insurance companies respond to the new framework.
If distributors receive lower remuneration, some may reduce their focus on products with smaller commissions. This could affect insurance accessibility, particularly in smaller cities and underserved markets.
On the other hand, improved transparency and restrictions on unsuitable sales practices could strengthen customer protection.
The ultimate outcome will depend on how IRDAI balances affordability, distribution efficiency and the availability of insurance services.
The Bigger Picture
IRDAI’s proposed commission overhaul represents an important shift in the economics of India’s insurance distribution industry.
The regulator is attempting to address rising distribution expenses while ensuring that insurance products deliver greater value to policyholders. However, commissions are also essential to maintaining the extensive network of agents, brokers and corporate distributors that help insurance companies reach customers.
The more than 650 responses demonstrate how widely the proposals could affect the industry. The final framework will need to account for differences between insurance products, distribution channels and the operating requirements of large and small businesses.
Looking Ahead
IRDAI’s examination of stakeholder feedback will determine how much of the original proposal is retained, modified or phased in. Insurance companies, brokers, banks and individual agents will closely monitor the draft guidelines and final commission limits before making changes to their distribution strategies.
If implemented carefully, the reforms could improve transparency and control excessive distribution expenses. However, the regulator will also need to ensure that lower commissions do not discourage insurance distribution or make it harder for customers to access suitable coverage.
Get the day’s top stories in your inbox
One concise email. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
